Why do they take the risk? A systematic review of the qualitative literature on informal sector abortions in settings where abortion is legal
- PMID: 30961574
- PMCID: PMC6454783
- DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0751-0
Why do they take the risk? A systematic review of the qualitative literature on informal sector abortions in settings where abortion is legal
Abstract
Background: Restrictive abortion laws are the single most important determinant of unsafe abortion, a major, yet preventable, global health issue. While reviews have been conducted on the extent of the phenomenon, no study has so far analysed the evidence of why women turn to informal sector providers when legal alternatives are available. This work provides a systematic review of the qualitative literature on informal sector abortion in setting where abortion is legal.
Methods: We used the PRISMA guidelines to search Pubmed, Web of Science, Sciencedirect and Google Scholar databases between January and February 2018. 2794 documents in English and French were screened for eligibility against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles investigating women's reasons for aborting in the informal sector in settings where abortion is legal were included. In total, sixteen articles were identified as eligible for this review. Findings were reported following the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: The review highlights the diverse reasons women turn to the informal sector, as abortions outside of legal health facilities were reported to be a widespread and normalised practice in countries where legal abortion is provided. Women cited a range of reasons for aborting in the informal sector; these included fear of mistreatment by staff, long waiting lists, high costs, inability to fulfil regulations, privacy concerns and lack of awareness about the legality of abortion or where to procure a safe and legal abortion. Not only was unsafe abortion spoken of in terms of medical and physical safety, but also in terms of social and economic security.
Conclusion: The use of informal sector abortions (ISAs) is a widespread and normalised practice in many countries despite the liberalisation of abortion laws. Although ISAs are not inherently unsafe, the practice in a setting where it is illegal will increase the likelihood that women will not be given the necessary information, or that they will be punished. This study brings to the fore the diverse reasons why women opt to abort outside formal healthcare settings and their issues with provision of abortion services in legal contexts, providing an evidence base for future research and policies.
Keywords: Informal sector abortion; Legal abortion; Qualitative research; Systematic reviews; Unsafe abortion; women’s rights.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
N/A
Consent for publication
N/A
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Women's experiences seeking informal sector abortion services in Cape Town, South Africa: a descriptive study.BMC Womens Health. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0443-6. BMC Womens Health. 2017. PMID: 28969631 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding abortion seeking care outside of formal health care settings in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study.Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 23;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01243-3. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34556120 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries.Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(2):297-314. doi: 10.2190/V08N-UE7N-TNBH-RA4P. Int J Health Serv. 1990. PMID: 2332264
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Conscientious objection to provision of legal abortion care.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123 Suppl 3:S60-2. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60004-1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013. PMID: 24332236 Review.
Cited by
-
Self-managed abortion: a constellation of actors, a cacophony of laws?Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1899764. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1899764. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021. PMID: 33764856 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The use of telemedicine services for medical abortion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD013764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013764.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40464275 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of peer relationships on young people's sexual health in Sub-Saharan African street contexts.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;288:113285. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113285. Epub 2020 Aug 14. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 32829967 Free PMC article.
-
Self-managed medication abortion outcomes: results from a prospective pilot study.Reprod Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01016-4. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 33109230 Free PMC article.
-
How, when and where? A systematic review on abortion decision making in legally restricted settings in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean.BMC Womens Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01962-0. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36217197 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO . Unsafe abortion. Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsae abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Sixth. 2011. pp. 1–56.
-
- Warriner I, Shah IH. Preventing unsafe abortion and its consequences: priorities for research and action. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2006. pp. 1–254.
-
- Kapp N, Blanchard K, Coast E, Ganatra B, Harries J, Footman K, et al. Developing a forward-looking agenda and methodologies for research of self-use of medical abortion. Contraception. 2018;97(2):184–188. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical