Reply to: Comments on the authors' reply to the critical appraisal concerning "Wearable cardioverter defibrillators for the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest: a health technology assessment and patient focus group study"
- PMID: 30962728
- PMCID: PMC6435117
- DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S202581
Reply to: Comments on the authors' reply to the critical appraisal concerning "Wearable cardioverter defibrillators for the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest: a health technology assessment and patient focus group study"
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.
Comment on
-
Critical appraisal concerning "Wearable cardioverter defibrillators for the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest: a health technology assessment and patient focus group study".Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Jun 8;11:201-204. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S165770. eCollection 2018. Med Devices (Auckl). 2018. PMID: 29922100 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Guideline; Internal validity of non-randomised studies (NRS) on interventions. Jul, 2015. [Accessed December 12, 2018]. Available from: https://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Internal-validity-of-....
-
- Chiarolla E, Orso M, Goetz G, Stanak M, Wild C, Jefferson T. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) therapy in primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest in patients at risk. AGENAS & LBI-HTA; 2018. [Accessed January 15, 2019]. Update. Available from: http://eprints.hta.lbg.ac.at/1186/
-
- Epstein AE, Abraham WT, Bianco NR, et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator use in patients perceived to be at high risk early post-myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(21):2000–2007. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
