Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 8;4(2):e000489.
doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000489. eCollection 2019.

Benefit from anti-EGFRs in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic transverse colon cancer: a clinical and molecular proof of concept study

Affiliations

Benefit from anti-EGFRs in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic transverse colon cancer: a clinical and molecular proof of concept study

Chiara Cremolini et al. ESMO Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Primary tumour location is regarded as a reliable surrogate of colorectal cancer biology. Sensitivity to anti-EGFRs (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) of metastatic transverse colon cancers (mTCCs) has usually been assumed similar to right-sided tumours; however, evidence about the clinical behaviour of mTCC is limited. Thus, to verify sensitivity of mTCC to anti-EGFRs we conducted the present study.

Methods: Patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type microsatellite stable (MSS) mTCC receiving anti-EGFR monotherapy, or in combination with irinotecan if clearly irinotecan-refractory, were included. Hypothesising an overall response rate (ORR) of 35%, 11 patients, of whom at least 3 were responders, were necessary to be able to reject the null hypothesis of an ORR of 5%, with α and β errors of 0.05 and 0.20. PRESSING panel and consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) were assessed on tumour samples, whereas in-silico data were obtained from TCGA dataset.

Results: Among nine eligible patients, four and three achieved response and disease stabilisation (ORR 44%). At a median follow-up of 23.1 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.3 (95% CI 3.9 to NA) and 15.0 months (95% CI 10.0 to NA), respectively. A MET amplification and an ERBB4 S303F substitution were detected in patients with rapid disease progression, while others had PRESSING panel-negative tumours with CMS2 or CMS4 subtypes.

Conclusions: RAS/BRAF wild-type MSS mTCCs may be sensitive to anti-EGFRs, as confirmed by molecular analyses.

Keywords: CMS subtypes; PRESSING panel; anti-EGFR, RAS and BRAF mutations; transverse colon cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram of the study depicting the process of patients’ selection. A total of 401 patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with an anti-EGFR containing regimen were reviewed. After screening for primary tumour location, 24 patients with mTCC were identified, of whom 9 received an anti-EGFR as single agent or in combination with irinotecan if clearly irinotecan-refractory and were included. mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; mTCC, metastatic transverse colon cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS (panel A) and OS (panel B) of patients with mTCC receiving an anti-EGFR based therapy. mTCC, metastatic transverse colon cancer; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Bar plot showing the frequency of pressing panel negative and positive in the KRAS and BRAF wt cases of COAD and READ TCGA datasets. (B) Bar plot showing the frequency of CMS classes in the KRAS and BRAF wt and pressing panel positive cases of COAD and READ TCGA datasets. Numbers of cases are reported on the top of each bar. COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; READ, rectum adenocarcinoma.

References

    1. Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Petrelli F, et al. . First-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in panRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015;96:156–66. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pietrantonio F, Petrelli F, Coinu A, et al. . Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:587–94. 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Aprile G, et al. . Single-agent panitumumab in frail elderly patients with advanced Ras and BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer: challenging drug label to light up new hope. Oncologist 2015;20:1261–5. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0171 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Borgonovo K, et al. . Prognostic survival associated with left-sided vs right-sided colon cancer. JAMA Oncol 2017;3 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4227 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold D, Lueza B, Douillard J-Y, et al. . Prognostic and predictive value of primary tumour side in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and EGFR directed antibodies in six randomized trials. Ann Oncol 2017;28:1713–29. 10.1093/annonc/mdx175 - DOI - PMC - PubMed