Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 16;286(1894):20182434.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2434.

Urban environment and cancer in wildlife: available evidence and future research avenues

Affiliations
Review

Urban environment and cancer in wildlife: available evidence and future research avenues

Tuul Sepp et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

While it is generally known that the risk of several cancers in humans is higher in urban areas compared with rural areas, cancer is often deemed a problem of human societies with modern lifestyles. At the same time, more and more wild animals are affected by urbanization processes and are faced with the need to adapt or acclimate to urban conditions. These include, among other things, increased exposure to an assortment of pollutants (e.g. chemicals, light and noise), novel types of food and new infections. According to the abundant literature available for humans, all of these factors are associated with an increased probability of developing cancerous neoplasias; however, the link between the urban environment and cancer in wildlife has not been discussed in the scientific literature. Here, we describe the available evidence linking environmental changes resulting from urbanization to cancer-related physiological changes in wild animals. We identify the knowledge gaps in this field and suggest future research avenues, with the ultimate aim of understanding how our modern lifestyle affects cancer prevalence in urbanizing wild populations. In addition, we consider the possibilities of using urban wild animal populations as models to study the association between environmental factors and cancer epidemics in humans, as well as to understand the evolution of cancer and defence mechanisms against it.

Keywords: anthropogenic effects; neoplasia; pace-of-life; senescence; urbanization; wild animals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of possible experimental designs for studying cancer in wild populations. Steps proposed here are based on the suggestions for studying evolution in urban environments by Donihue & Lambert [2]. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Johnson MTJ, Munshi-South J. 2017. Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358, eaam8327 ( 10.1126/science.aam8327) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donihue CM, Lambert MR. 2014. Adaptive evolution in urban ecosystems. Ambio 44, 194–203. ( 10.1007/s13280-014-0547-2) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santangelo JS, Rivkin LR, Johnson MTJ. 2018. The evolution of city life. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20181529 ( 10.1098/rspb.2018.1529) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lehrer EW, Schooley RL, Nevis JM, Kilgour RJ, Wolff PJ, Magle SB. 2016. Happily ever after? Fates of translocated nuisance woodchucks in the Chicago metropolitan area. Urban Ecosyst. 19, 1389 ( 10.1007/s11252-016-0560-2) - DOI
    1. Soulsbury CD, White PCL. 2016. Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildlife Res. 42, 541–553. ( 10.1071/wr14229) - DOI

Publication types