Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 1;44(6):395-406.
doi: 10.1503/jpn.180195.

Altered reward-related effective connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an fMRI study

Affiliations

Altered reward-related effective connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an fMRI study

Ana Alves-Pinto et al. J Psychiatry Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by anxiety-provoking, obsessive thoughts. Patients usually react to these thoughts with repetitive behaviours that reduce anxiety and are perceived as rewarding. Hence, reward plays a major role in the psychopathology of OCD. Previous studies showed altered activation in frontostriatal networks, among others, in association with the processing of reward in patients with OCD. Potential alterations in connectivity within these networks have, however, barely been explored.

Methods: We investigated a sample of patients with OCD and healthy controls using functional MRI and a reward learning task presented in an event-related design. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) was used to estimate effective connectivity.

Results: Our sample included 37 patients with OCD and 39 healthy controls. Analyses of task-related changes in connectivity showed a significantly altered effective connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), among others, both in terms of endogenous connectivity as well as modulatory effects under positive feedback. Clinical measures of compulsion correlated with the effect of feedback input on visual sensory areas.

Limitations: The reported alterations should be interpreted within the context of the task and the a priori–defined network considered in the analysis.

Conclusion: This disrupted connectivity in parts of the default mode network and the frontostriatal network may indicate increased rumination and self-related processing impairing the responsiveness toward external rewards. This, in turn, may underlie the general urge for reinforcement accompanying compulsive behaviours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental design.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Localization of volumes of interest (VOIs) used in the dynamic causal modelling analysis. The regions illustrated correspond to 4 mm spheres at average Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates of the group of control participants. DS/Put = dorsal striatum/putamen; Ins = insula; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex; V1 = visual cortex; vmPFC = ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
One of the 21 models constituting the model space, in this case with the modulatory effect between visual cortex and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) for both forward and backward direction. The connections considered are backed up by previous anatomic studies, as indicated by the numbers1,, 2–4, 5, 6, 7 and 8., DS/Put = dorsal striatum/putamen; Ins = insula; l = left; r = right; V1 = visual cortex; vmPFC = ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) Model exceedance probabilities. (B) Winning model (highest exceedance probability) for patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD; model 3) and control (model 1) groups. DS/Put = dorsal striatum/putamen; Ins = insula; l = left; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex; r = right; V1 = visual cortex; vmPFC = ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
(A) Compulsion measure of Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) as a function of input effect on the left visual cortex for negative feedback in all patients, and (B) in medicated patients only. (C) Obsessive–Compulsive Inventory (OCI) as a function of input effect on the left visual cortex (V1) for negative feedback and for medicated patients only.

References

    1. Milad MR, Rauch SL. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: beyond segregated cortico-striatal pathways. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16:43–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sescousse G, Caldú X, Segura B, et al. Processing of primary and secondary rewards: a quantitative meta-analysis and review of human functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:681–96. - PubMed
    1. Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML. Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron. 2015;86:646–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:1061–8. - PubMed
    1. Huff W, Lenartz D, Schormann M, et al. Unilateral deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: outcomes after one year. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:137–43. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms