Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr 1;374(1769):20180201.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0201.

Monogamy without parental care? Social and genetic mating systems of avian brood parasites

Affiliations
Review

Monogamy without parental care? Social and genetic mating systems of avian brood parasites

William E Feeney et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Classic evolutionary theory predicts that monogamy should be intimately linked with parental care. It has long been assumed, therefore, that avian brood parasites-which lay their eggs in the nests of 'host' species and provide little, if any, parental care-should be overwhelmingly promiscuous. However, recent studies have revealed that the social mating systems of brood parasites are surprisingly diverse, encompassing lek polygyny, monogamy, polygamy and promiscuity. What ecological or phylogenetic factors explain this variation, and why are some brood parasites apparently monogamous? Here we review the social and genetic mating systems of all 75 brood parasitic species for which data are available and evaluate several hypotheses that may help explain these patterns. We find that social monogamy is widespread, often co-occurring with territoriality and cooperative behaviour by the mated pair. Comparative studies, though preliminary, suggest that in some species, monogamy is associated with low host density and polygamy with higher host density. Interestingly, molecular data show that genetic and social mating systems can be entirely decoupled: genetic monogamy can occur in parasitic species that lack behavioural pair-bonds, possibly as a by-product of territoriality; conversely, social monogamy has been reported in parasites that are genetically polygamous. This synthesis suggests that social and genetic monogamy may result from very different selective pressures, and that male-female cooperative behaviours, population density and territoriality may all interact to favour the evolution of monogamous mating in brood parasites. Given that detailed descriptive data of social, and especially genetic, mating systems are still lacking for the majority of brood parasitic species, definitive tests of these hypotheses await future work. This article is part of the theme issue 'The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern'.

Keywords: brood parasitism; polygamy; reproductive trade-offs; sexual selection; social evolution; territoriality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Orians GH. 1969. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am. Nat. 103, 589–603. (10.1086/282628) - DOI
    1. Lack D. 1968. Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
    1. Møller AP. 2000. Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11, 161–168. (10.1093/beheco/11.2.161) - DOI
    1. Whiteman EA, Côté IM. 2004. Monogamy in marine fishes. Biol. Rev. 79, 351–375. (10.1017/S1464793103006304) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tumulty J, Morales V, Summers K. 2014. The biparental care hypothesis for the evolution of monogamy: experimental evidence in an amphibian. Behav. Ecol. 25, 262–270. (10.1093/beheco/art116) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources