Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;32(2):197-205.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review

Affiliations

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review

James W Garrard et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) involves the multidimensional assessment and management of an older person. It is well described in hospital and home-based settings. A novel approach could be to perform CGA within primary healthcare, the initial community located healthcare setting for patients, improving accessibility to a co-located multidisciplinary team.

Aim: To appraise the evidence on CGA implemented within the primary care practice.

Methods: The review followed PRISMA recommendations. Eligible studies reported CGA on persons aged ≥ 65 in a primary care practice. Studies focusing on a single condition were excluded. Searches were run in five databases; reference lists and publications were screened. Two researchers independently screened for eligibility and assessed study quality. All study outcomes were reviewed.

Results: The authors screened 9003 titles, 145 abstracts and 97 full texts. Four studies were included. Limited study bias was observed. Studies were heterogeneous in design and reported outcomes. CGAs were led by a geriatrician (n = 3) or nurse practitioner (n = 1), with varied length and extent of follow-up (12-48 months). Post-intervention hospital admission rates showed mixed results, with improved adherence to medication modifications. No improvement in survival or functional outcomes was observed. Interventions were widely accepted and potentially cost-effective.

Discussion: The four studies demonstrated that CGA was acceptable and provided variable outcome benefit. Further research is needed to identify the most effective strategy for implementing CGA in primary care. Particular questions include identification of patients suitable for CGA within primary care CGA, a consensus list of outcome measures, and the role of different healthcare professionals in delivering CGA.

Keywords: Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Older people; Primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram showing the selection of articles for inclusion and exclusion

References

    1. Rubenstein LZ, Goodwin M, Hadley E, et al. Working group recommendations: targeting criteria for geriatric evaluation and management research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:37S–41S. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb05932.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stuck A, Siu A, Wieland G, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet. 1993;342:1032–1036. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, Robinson D, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d6553. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6553. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M, et al. Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2001;323:719–725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7315.719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Commission (2012) Ageing report: Europe needs to prepare for growing older

Publication types