Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 26:7:98.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00098. eCollection 2019.

Propofol Sedation by Pediatric Gastroenterologists for Endoscopic Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations

Propofol Sedation by Pediatric Gastroenterologists for Endoscopic Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis

Aya Khalila et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: There is a substantial literature on the favorable outcome of propofol administration by non-anesthesiologists for endoscopy in adults; however, very few data are currently available on propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists. Aims: to evaluate the safety of propofol sedation by pediatric gastroenterologists. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all children who were sedated by pediatric gastroenterologists in three Northern Israeli hospitals over a 4 years period Demographic and medical characteristics and any data regarding the procedure were extracted from patient's records. The main outcome measurements were procedure completion and reported adverse events. Results: Overall, 1,214 endoscopic procedures for were performed during this period. Complete data was available for 1,190 procedures. All children sedated by pediatric gastroenterologists were classified as ASA I or II. Propofol dosage (in mg/kg) inversely correlated with patient age. The younger the child the higher the dose needed to reach a satisfactory level of sedation (r = -0.397, p < 0.001). The addition of fentanyl significantly decreased propofol dosage needed to provide optimal sedation, p < 0.001. Nine (0.7%) reversible adverse events were reported. All the procedures were successfully completed and all patients were discharged home. Conclusions: We conclude that our approach is safe in children as it is in adults and can be implemented for children with ASA I, II.

Keywords: children; endoscopies; non-anesthesiologist administered propofol; safety; sedation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relation between patient age and propofol dose (mg/kg).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relation between presence of anesthetist and propofol dose.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relation between procedure location and propofol dose/kg.

References

    1. Friedt M, Welsch S. An update on pediatric endoscopy. Eur J Med Res. (2013) 18:24. 10.1186/2047-783X-18-24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green SM, Klooster M, Harris T, Lynch EL, Rothrock SG. Ketamine sedation for pediatric gastroenterology procedures. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2001) 32:26–33. 10.1097/00005176-200101000-00010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics. (1992) 89:1110–5. - PubMed
    1. Fredette ME, Lightdale JR. Endoscopic sedation in pediatric practice. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. (2008) 18:739–51, ix. 10.1016/j.giec.2008.06.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim EH, Lee SK. Endoscopist-directed propofol: pros and cons. Clin Endosc. (2014) 47:129–34. 10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources