Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192103.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2103.

Trends in the Proportion of Female Speakers at Medical Conferences in the United States and in Canada, 2007 to 2017

Shannon M Ruzycki  1 , Sarah Fletcher  2 , Madalene Earp  3 , Aleem Bharwani  1 , Kirstie C Lithgow  4
Affiliations

Trends in the Proportion of Female Speakers at Medical Conferences in the United States and in Canada, 2007 to 2017

Shannon M Ruzycki et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Gender equity is a prominent issue in the medical profession. Representation of female physicians at academic meetings has been identified as an important component of gender equity; however, this topic has not been systematically assessed.

Objective: To determine the trend during the last decade in the proportion of speakers who were women at major academic medical conferences held in Canada and in the United States.

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted examining the gender of speakers listed in meeting programs of medical conferences held in Canada and in the United States in 2007 and from 2013 through 2017. Eligible conferences were identified using a sensitive search strategy, and a previously validated tool was used to analyze each meeting speaker list and to assign a proportion of female speakers. Conferences held in English language, hosted in Canada or the United States, and targeted to a physician audience with 100 or more attendees were included. The comparison group was active physicians in Canada and in the United States.

Main outcomes and measures: The mean of the proportion of female speakers at each conference per year.

Results: In total, 181 conferences with 701 individual meetings were analyzed, including 100 medical and 81 surgical specialty conferences. The proportion of women ranged from 0% to 82.6% of all speakers. The mean (SD) proportion of female conference speakers for all meetings analyzed significantly increased from 24.6% (14.6%) for 40 meetings in 2007 to 34.1% (15.1%) for 181 meetings in 2017 (P < .001). The mean proportion of female speakers at medical specialty conferences was 9.8% higher (SE, 1.9%; P < .001) than the mean proportion of female speakers at surgical specialty conferences for all years analyzed. The mean proportion of female speakers at conferences was similar to the mean proportion of active female physicians across all specialties in the United States and in Canada for all years analyzed.

Conclusions and relevance: Although our findings indicate that the proportion of female speakers at medical conferences increased during the last decade, women continue to be underrepresented. Speaker invitation and selection at conferences represent important opportunities to influence gender equity within medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Diagram of the Conference Search Strategy
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mean Proportion of Female Speakers at Conference Meetings per Year and Proportion of Female Physicians, in the United States and Canada.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Mean Proportion of Female Speakers at Medical Specialty and at Surgical Specialty Conference Meetings per Year From 2007 to 2017 vs the Proportion of Female Physicians Practicing in Medical Specialties and Family Medicine or in Surgical Specialties, in the United States and Canada
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mascarenhas A, Moore JE, Tricco AC, et al. . Perceptions and experiences of a gender gap at a Canadian research institute and potential strategies to mitigate this gap: a sequential mixed-methods study. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(1):-. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20160114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooke M. Implicit bias in academic medicine: #WhatADoctorLooksLike. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):657-658. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9643 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1149-1158. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10680 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Qadri U, Arora VM. Comparison of male vs female resident milestone evaluations by faculty during emergency medicine residency training. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):651-65. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9616 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender differences in attending physicians’ feedback to residents: a qualitative analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(5):577-585. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-17-00126.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types