Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;39(7):527-535.
doi: 10.1002/pd.5459. Epub 2019 May 10.

Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound

Affiliations

Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound

Ezra Aydin et al. Prenat Diagn. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This study measured anogenital distance (AGD) during late second/early third trimester of pregnancy to confirm previous findings that AGD can be measured noninvasively in the fetus using ultrasound and further showed differences in reference ranges between populations.

Method: Two hundred ten singleton pregnancies were recruited at the Rosie Hospital, Cambridge, UK. A 2D ultrasound was performed between 26 and 30 weeks of pregnancy. AGD was measured from the centre of the anus to the base of the scrotum in males and to the posterior convergence of the fourchette in females.

Results: A significant difference in AGD between males and females (P < .0001) was found, replicating previous results with a significant correlation between estimated fetal weight (EFW) and AGD in males only (P = .006). A comparison of AGD using reference data from an Israeli sample (n = 118) and our UK sample (n = 208) showed a significant difference (P < .0001) in both males and females, after controlling for gestational age (GA).

Conclusion: Our results confirm that AGD measurement in utero using ultrasound is feasible. In addition, there are strong sex differences, consistent with previous suggestions that AGD is influenced by prenatal androgen exposure. AGD lengths differ between the UK and Israel; therefore, population-specific normative values may be required for accurate clinical assessments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of the perineum in a female fetus demonstrating the anogenital distance measurement. AGD was measured from the centre of the anus to the posterior convergence of the fourchette. The posterior convergence of the fourchette was identified by the visibility of three white lines [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of the perineum in a male fetus demonstrating the anogenital distance measurement AGD was measured from the centre of the anus to the base of the scrotum. The scrotum was identified by the visibility of the scrotal sack [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland‐Altman plot observing intraobserver variability
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bland‐Altman plot observing interobserver variability
Figure 5
Figure 5
A scatterplot of raw AGD measures split by males fetuses and female fetuses between 25 and 31 weeks of gestation. Mean linear regression lines have been plotted by sex [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 6
Figure 6
A scatterplot of matched raw AGD measures taken in both UK and Israel populations by sex between 26 and 31 weeks of gestation. Mean linear regression lines have been plotted by sex [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Gilboa Y, Kivilevitch Z, Oren M, Cohen YP, Katorza E, Achiron R. Anogenital distance in male and female fetuses at 20 to 35weeks of gestation: centile charts and reference ranges. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(10):946‐951. - PubMed
    1. Thankamony A, Ong KK, Dunger DB, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: a population study. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(11):1786‐1790. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thankamony A, Pasterski V, Ong KK, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology. 2016;4(4):616‐625. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain VG, Singal AK. Shorter anogenital distance correlates with undescended testis: a detailed genital anthropometric analysis in human newborns. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2343‐2349. - PubMed
    1. Freire C, Ocón‐Hernández O, Dávila‐Arias C, et al. Anogenital distance and reproductive outcomes in 9‐ to 11‐year‐old boys: the INMA‐Granada cohort study. Andrology [Internet]. 2018;6(6):1‐8. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/andr.12544 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms