Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 21:10:626.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00626. eCollection 2019.

TV vs. YouTube: TV Advertisements Capture More Visual Attention, Create More Positive Emotions and Have a Stronger Impact on Implicit Long-Term Memory

Affiliations

TV vs. YouTube: TV Advertisements Capture More Visual Attention, Create More Positive Emotions and Have a Stronger Impact on Implicit Long-Term Memory

David Weibel et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In an experiment, effects of commercials that are either shown within a TV program or embedded in YouTube videos were compared. These two media environments have not yet been compared empirically in terms of their advertising impact. A within-subjects design and a multi-method approach were used (N = 36). Eye tracking data show that more attention is allocated to advertisements that appear within a TV program compared to the YouTube-condition and the viewing experience elicited more positive emotions in the TV-condition. Two days after reception, no difference in recognition, likeability, and purchase intention occurred, but in terms of implicit long-term memory: In the TV condition, brands that were previously advertised but no longer remembered elicited stronger skin conductance change than brands for which no advertisements had previously been shown. In terms of advertising impact, TV seems to still be the better choice for advertisers. Presentation mode should be considered in future evaluation of advertisement potential.

Keywords: YouTube; advertisements; eye-tracking; implicit memory; long-term memory; purchase intent; skin-conductance response; television.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of the procedure.

References

    1. Aaker D. A., Bruzzone D. E. (1985). Causes of irritation in advertising. J. Mark. 49 47–57. 10.1177/002224298504900204 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boucsein W. (1992). Electrodermal Activity. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
    1. Brasel S. A., Gips J. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14 527–534. 10.1089/cyber.2010.0350 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bronner F., Neijens P. (2006). Audience experiences of media context and embedded advertising: a comparison of eight media. Int. J. Mark. Res. 48 81–100. 10.1177/147078530604800106 - DOI
    1. Buzzetto-More N. A. (2014). An examination of undergraduate student’s perceptions and predilections of the use of YouTube in the teaching and learning process. Interdisciplin. J. eLearn. Learn. Objects 10 17–32.

LinkOut - more resources