Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;9(2):173-178.
doi: 10.1177/2192568218784298. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Harboring Contaminants in Repeatedly Reprocessed Pedicle Screws

Affiliations

Harboring Contaminants in Repeatedly Reprocessed Pedicle Screws

Aakash Agarwal et al. Global Spine J. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: It consisted of evaluation of the pedicle screws for presence of residual nonmicrobial contaminants and tabulation of the minimum steps and time required for reprocessing implants as per guidelines and its comparison with actual practice.

Objective: An evaluation of the nonmicrobial contaminants prevalent on the pedicle screws used for spine surgery and the underlying practice cause behind the source.

Methods: The first component consisted of a random selection of 6 pedicle screws and its assessment using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The second component consisted of review of implant reprocessing guidelines and its applicability.

Results: Three types of contaminants were identified: corrosion, saccharide of unknown origin, and soap residue mixed with and were mostly present at the interfaces with low permeability. In addition, manufacturer's guideline recommends 19 hours of reprocessing, whereas the real-time observation revealed a turnaround time of 1 hour 17 minutes.

Conclusion: Repeatedly reprocessed pedicle screws host corrosion, carbohydrate, fat, and soap, which could be a cause of surgical site infection and inflammatory responses postsurgery. The cause behind it is the impracticality of repeated cleaning and inspection of such devices.

Keywords: SPD; SSI; implant exposure; preoperative implant handling; sterile processing department; surgical site infection; terminally sterile devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Coauthors are employed or have stock options in Spinal Balance Inc, a company providing sterile orthopedic implants, in addition to their respective academic affiliations.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Corrosion on the washer.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Corrosion on the tulip interface.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Saccharide of unknown origin.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Soap residue mixed with fat.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
FTR conforming the results.

References

    1. McClelland S, 3rd, Takemoto RC, Lonner BS, et al. Analysis of postoperative thoracolumbar spine infections in a prospective randomized controlled trial using the Centers for Disease Control surgical site infection criteria. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell MA. Hospital uses team approach to improve processes, reduce costs. AORN J. 1998;68:68–72. - PubMed
    1. Chobin N, Trattler B. Perspectives from sterile processing and perioperative services. Mater Manag Health Care. 2003;12:22–25. - PubMed
    1. Swanson SC. Shifting the sterile processing department paradigm: a mandate for change. AORN J. 2008;88:241–247. - PubMed
    1. Alfa MJ. The “Pandora’s box” dilemma: reprocessing of implantable screws and plates in orthopedic tray sets. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2012;(suppl):55–59. - PubMed