The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study
- PMID: 30985449
- PMCID: PMC6579683
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003779
The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study
Abstract
Objectives: It is unclear if a low- or high-volume IV fluid resuscitation strategy is better for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Two adult acute care hospitals within a single academic system.
Patients: Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the ICU from November 2016 to February 2018.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to a restrictive IV fluid resuscitation strategy (≤ 60 mL/kg of IV fluid) or usual care for the first 72 hours of care.
Measurements and main results: We enrolled 109 patients, of whom 55 were assigned to the restrictive resuscitation group and 54 to the usual care group. The restrictive group received significantly less resuscitative IV fluid than the usual care group (47.1 vs 61.1 mL/kg; p = 0.01) over 72 hours. By 30 days, there were 12 deaths (21.8%) in the restrictive group and 12 deaths (22.2%) in the usual care group (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.41-2.53). There were no differences between groups in the rate of new organ failure, hospital or ICU length of stay, or serious adverse events.
Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that a restrictive resuscitation strategy can successfully reduce the amount of IV fluid administered to patients with severe sepsis and septic shock compared with usual care. Although limited by the sample size, we observed no increase in mortality, organ failure, or adverse events. These findings further support that a restrictive IV fluid strategy should be explored in a larger multicenter trial.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Comment in
-
Enough Is As Good As a Feast.Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;47(7):1004-1006. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003791. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31205084 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1582-1590. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003960. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31393324 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Fluid Resuscitation Initiation Within 30 Minutes of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Recognition With Reduced Mortality and Length of Stay.Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;68(3):298-311. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.044. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Ann Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27085369
-
[Impact and clinical significance of different types of fluid resuscitation on the glycocalyx in patients with early sepsis and septic shock: a single center, prospective, randomized controlled trial].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Mar;37(3):237-244. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240711-00583. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025. PMID: 40201993 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Effect of restrictive fluid resuscitation on severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e086367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086367. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39956601 Free PMC article.
-
Restrictive resuscitation in patients with sepsis and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Feb;43(2):104-114. doi: 10.1002/phar.2764. Epub 2023 Jan 21. Pharmacotherapy. 2023. PMID: 36625778 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Patients.Cureus. 2023 Aug 29;15(8):e44317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44317. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37779759 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Getting to the Heart of the Matter: What We Know About Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Heart Failure Patients.Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):e259-e260. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004126. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32058403 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients in the PROCESS trial.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Jan 18;2(1):e12358. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12358. eCollection 2021 Feb. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021. PMID: 33506231 Free PMC article.
-
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Determination of Cardiac Output Augmentation in a Swine Model of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Crit Care Explor. 2022 Aug 15;4(8):e0749. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000749. eCollection 2022 Aug. Crit Care Explor. 2022. PMID: 35982838 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutic approaches for septicemia induced by multidrug-resistant bacteria using desert-adapted plants.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 22;15:1493769. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1493769. eCollection 2025. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40330024 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al.: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368–1377 - PubMed
-
- Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al.: Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496–1506 - PubMed
-
- Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al.: Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1301–1311 - PubMed
-
- Alphonsus CS, Rodseth RN: The endothelial glycocalyx: a review of the vascular barrier. Anaesthesia 2014; 69:777–784 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources