Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jul;47(7):951-959.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003779.

The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Restrictive IV Fluid Trial in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock (RIFTS): A Randomized Pilot Study

Keith A Corl et al. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: It is unclear if a low- or high-volume IV fluid resuscitation strategy is better for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Two adult acute care hospitals within a single academic system.

Patients: Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the ICU from November 2016 to February 2018.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to a restrictive IV fluid resuscitation strategy (≤ 60 mL/kg of IV fluid) or usual care for the first 72 hours of care.

Measurements and main results: We enrolled 109 patients, of whom 55 were assigned to the restrictive resuscitation group and 54 to the usual care group. The restrictive group received significantly less resuscitative IV fluid than the usual care group (47.1 vs 61.1 mL/kg; p = 0.01) over 72 hours. By 30 days, there were 12 deaths (21.8%) in the restrictive group and 12 deaths (22.2%) in the usual care group (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.41-2.53). There were no differences between groups in the rate of new organ failure, hospital or ICU length of stay, or serious adverse events.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that a restrictive resuscitation strategy can successfully reduce the amount of IV fluid administered to patients with severe sepsis and septic shock compared with usual care. Although limited by the sample size, we observed no increase in mortality, organ failure, or adverse events. These findings further support that a restrictive IV fluid strategy should be explored in a larger multicenter trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interests: no authors have any conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure #1
Figure #1
Enrollment, randomization, and follow up of trial participants. Other reasons for exclusion include: no available translator, intravenous fluids not documented, patient weight not documented, and left against medical advise.
Figure #2:
Figure #2:
Kaplan Meier survival estimate in the intention-to-treat population during the 60-day trial period.
Figure #3:
Figure #3:
Amount of resuscitative IV fluid administered in select sepsis trials and 60-day mortality. The area of the circle is proportional to trial sample size. Resuscitative fluid volume in ml/kg for Rivers, ProMISe and ProCESS are estimated based upon an average 80kg participant. ProMISe and ARISE study groups combined into single circle secondary to significant overlap in IV fluid administered and mortality between study groups. EGTD = early goal directed therapy, P = protocol, R = restricted, UC = usual care.

Comment in

  • Enough Is As Good As a Feast.
    Beale R. Beale R. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;47(7):1004-1006. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003791. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31205084 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al.: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368–1377 - PubMed
    1. Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al.: Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1496–1506 - PubMed
    1. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al.: A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1683–1693 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al.: Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1301–1311 - PubMed
    1. Alphonsus CS, Rodseth RN: The endothelial glycocalyx: a review of the vascular barrier. Anaesthesia 2014; 69:777–784 - PubMed

Publication types