Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 1;173(6):571-577.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0621.

Intimate Partner Homicide of Adolescents

Affiliations

Intimate Partner Homicide of Adolescents

Avanti Adhia et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Abstract

Importance: Intimate partner violence during adolescence is widespread, and consequences can be severe. Intimate partner homicide (IPH) is the most extreme form of intimate partner violence, but literature on IPH has almost exclusively focused on adults.

Objectives: To determine the proportion of adolescent homicides that is perpetrated by intimate partners and to describe the victim, perpetrator, and incident characteristics of these IPHs.

Design, setting, and participants: Analysis of quantitative and qualitative surveillance data from the National Violent Death Reporting System from 2003 to 2016. Data represent 32 states that contributed to the system for 1 year or longer. There were 8048 homicides of victims aged 11 to 24 years with a known relationship between the victim and perpetrator. For persons aged 11 to 18 years, there were 2188 homicides. Analysis began September 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: An incident was identified as an IPH if the relationship between the perpetrator and victim was coded as spouse, ex-spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend, ex-girlfriend or ex-boyfriend, or girlfriend or boyfriend (unspecified current or former). Variables of interest included demographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity) for the victim and perpetrator, relationship status at time of death, homicide-suicide, homicide method, firearm type, and location of homicide. Contextual categories were created from the qualitative narratives.

Results: Of adolescent homicides, 150 (6.9%) were classified as IPH. A total of 135 victims (90%) were female (mean [SD] age, 16.8 [1.3] years). Overall, 102 perpetrators (77.9%) were 18 years and older (mean [SD] age, 20.6 [5.0] years), and 94 (62.7%) were current intimate partners of the victim. Firearms, specifically handguns, were the most common mechanism of injury. Compared with IPHs of young adults aged 19 to 24 years, perpetrators of adolescent victims were younger and less likely to be a current intimate partner. The most common categories of adolescent IPH homicides were broken/desired relationship or jealousy and an altercation followed by reckless firearm behavior and pregnancy related.

Conclusions and relevance: Adolescents, particularly girls, in dating relationships may face risk of homicide, especially in circumstances of a breakup or jealousy and when perpetrators have access to firearms. Understanding homicide in early dating relationships can inform prevention and intervention efforts tailored to adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Adhia reports a grant from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development during the conduct of the study. Drs Rivara and Vavilala report grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

References

    1. Peterson C, Kearns MC, McIntosh WLKW, et al. Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(4):433-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Basile KC, Walters ML, Chen J, Merrick MT. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization: National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(8):1-18. doi: 10.1530/ERC-14-0411.Persistent - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance: United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67(8):1-114. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor BG, Mumford EA. A national descriptive portrait of adolescent relationship abuse: results from the national survey on teen relationships and intimate violence. J Interpers Violence. 2016;31(6):963-988. doi: 10.1177/0886260514564070 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stöckl H, Dekel B, Morris-Gehring A, Watts C, Abrahams N. Child homicide perpetrators worldwide: a systematic review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1(1):e000112. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000112 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types