Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 2;19(7):1597.
doi: 10.3390/s19071597.

Exploring the Role of Wearable Technology in Sport Kinematics and Kinetics: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Exploring the Role of Wearable Technology in Sport Kinematics and Kinetics: A Systematic Review

Yewande Adesida et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The aim of this review was to understand the use of wearable technology in sport in order to enhance performance and prevent injury. Understanding sports biomechanics is important for injury prevention and performance enhancement and is traditionally assessed using optical motion capture. However, such approaches are limited by capture volume restricting assessment to a laboratory environment, a factor that can be overcome by wearable technology. A systematic search was carried out across seven databases where wearable technology was employed to assess kinetic and kinematic variables in sport. Articles were excluded if they focused on sensor design and did not measure kinetic or kinematic variables or apply the technology on targeted participants. A total of 33 articles were included for full-text analysis where participants took part in a sport and performed dynamic movements relating to performance monitored by wearable technologies. Inertial measurement units, flex sensors and magnetic field and angular rate sensors were among the devices used in over 15 sports to quantify motion. Wearable technology usage is still in an exploratory phase, but there is potential for this technology to positively influence coaching practice and athletes' technique.

Keywords: athlete; coaching; kinematics; motion analysis; sensors; sports performance; wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA chart detailing the article selection process [57].

References

    1. Jones R.L., Wallace M. Another bad day at the training ground: Coping with ambiguity in the coaching context. Sport Educ. Soc. 2005;10:119–134. doi: 10.1080/1357332052000308792. - DOI
    1. Pueo B., Jimenez-Olmedo J. Application of motion capture technology for sport performance analysis. Retos. 2017;32:241–247.
    1. Krüger A., Edelmann-Nusser J. Biomechanical analysis in freestyle snowboarding: Application of a full-body inertial measurement system and a bilateral insole measurement system. Sports Technol. 2009;2:17–23. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2009.9648494. - DOI
    1. Bachlin M., Troster G. Swimming performance and technique evaluation with wearable acceleration sensors. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2012;8:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.05.003. - DOI
    1. Chardonnens J., Favre J., Cuendet F., Gremion G., Aminian K. Measurement of the dynamics in ski jumping using a wearable inertial sensor-based system. J. Sports Sci. 2014;32:591–600. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.845679. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types