Quasi-experimental causality in neuroscience and behavioural research
- PMID: 30988445
- DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0466-5
Quasi-experimental causality in neuroscience and behavioural research
Abstract
In many scientific domains, causality is the key question. For example, in neuroscience, we might ask whether a medication affects perception, cognition or action. Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to establish causality, but they are not always practical. The field of empirical economics has developed rigorous methods to establish causality even when randomized controlled trials are not available. Here we review these quasi-experimental methods and highlight how neuroscience and behavioural researchers can use them to do research that can credibly demonstrate causal effects.
References
-
- Pearl, J. Causality (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2009).
-
- The Notorious B.I.G. Mo’ Money Mo’ Problems (Bad Boy Records, 1997).
-
- Grodstein, F. et al. A prospective, observational study of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 133, 933–941 (2000). - DOI
-
- Manson, J. E. et al. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 523–534 (2003). - DOI
-
- Humphrey, L. L., Chan, B. K. & Sox, H. C. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 137, 273–284 (2002). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
