Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun:70:79-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

Measurement of substance-free reinforcement in addiction: A systematic review

Affiliations

Measurement of substance-free reinforcement in addiction: A systematic review

Samuel F Acuff et al. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

A robust body of theoretical and experimental work highlights the influence of alternative, substance-free rewards on decisions to use alcohol and other drugs. However, translational applications have been limited in part by the lack of consensus on how to measure substance-free reinforcement in applied and clinical settings. The current study summarizes extant research utilizing self-report reinforcement or reward methodologies, and critically reviews the psychometric properties of the available measures. These studies (N = 50) fell into three categories: measures of recent substance-related and substance-free activity participation and enjoyment (n = 32), measures of time or monetary resource allocation (n = 15), and rating scale measures of reward availability and experience (n = 8). The available research suggests that, consistent with experimental laboratory research and with behavioral economic predictions, there is an inverse relation between substance-free reinforcement and substance use. These studies also support the clinical utility of these measures in predicting substance use severity and course. Reinforcement measures could be improved by enhancing content validity, multimethod convergent validity, and generalizability.

Keywords: Addiction; Alternative reinforcement; Behavioral economics; Reward; Substance-free reinforcement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) inclusion flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acuff SF, Luciano MT, Soltis KE, Joyner KJ, Mcdevitt-Murphy ME, & Murphy JG (2018). Access to environmental reward mediates the relation between posttraumatic stress symptoms and alcohol problems and craving. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 25(5), 412–421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acuff SF, Soltis KE, Dennhardt AA, Berlin KS, & Murphy JG (2018). Evaluating behavioral economic models of heavy drinking among college students. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 42(7), 1304–1314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acuff SF, Soltis KE, Dennhardt AA, Borsari B, Martens MP, & Murphy JG (2017). Future So Bright? Delay discounting and consideration of future consequences predict academic performance among college drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amspoker AB, Hersch G, Snow AL, Wilson N, Morgan RO, Sansgiry S, & Kunik ME (2017). A psychometric evaluation of the Pleasant Events Schedule–Alzheimer’s Disease (short version). Journal of Applied Gerontology, 073346481769067. 10.1177/0733464817690675 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrabi N, Khoddam R, & Leventhal AM (2017). Socioeconomic disparities in adolescent substance use: Role of enjoyable alternative substance-free activities. Social Science & Medicine, 176, 175–182. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms