Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;9(5):587-604.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1196. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

Engineering Multidimensional Evolutionary Forces to Combat Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Engineering Multidimensional Evolutionary Forces to Combat Cancer

Caroline E McCoach et al. Cancer Discov. 2019 May.

Abstract

With advances in technology and bioinformatics, we are now positioned to view and manage cancer through an evolutionary lens. This perspective is critical as our appreciation for the role of tumor heterogeneity, tumor immune compartment, and tumor microenvironment on cancer pathogenesis and evolution grows. Here, we explore recent knowledge on the evolutionary basis of cancer pathogenesis and progression, viewing tumors as multilineage, multicomponent organisms whose growth is regulated by subcomponent fitness relationships. We propose reconsidering some current tenets of the cancer management paradigm in order to take better advantage of crucial fitness relationships to improve outcomes of patients with cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: Tumor and tumor immune compartment and microenvironment heterogeneity, and their evolution, are critical disease features that affect treatment response. The impact and interplay of these components during treatment are viable targets to improve clinical response. In this article, we consider how tumor cells, the tumor immune compartment and microenvironment, and epigenetic factors interact and also evolve during treatment. We evaluate the convergence of these factors and suggest innovative treatment concepts that leverage evolutionary relationships to limit tumor growth and drug resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest. T.G.B is a consultant/advisor to Novartis, AstraZeneca, Revolution Medicines, Takeda, and Array Biopharma and has received research funding from Novartis, Revolution Medicines, and Ignyta. C.E.M. has received honoraria from Takeda, Guardant Health and research funding from Novartis and Revolution Medicines and personal fees from Novartis.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Tumor cell influences and evolution.
Depiction of the evolutionary paths of tumor cells. The center portion of this image depicts a group of heterogeneous tumor cells. There are four predominant, and often overlapping, categories of evolutionary influence that can impact tumor cells during cancer progression and treatment that impact response to therapies. Each category depicts several individual mechanisms of tumor promotion and evolution. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and can occur concurrently. Abbreviations: APC- antigen present cell, CAF- Cancer associated Fibroblast, EGF – Endothelial growth factor, EMT – epithelial to mesenchymal transition, FGF – Fibroblast growth factor, miRNA- micro-RNA, MMP- Matrix metalloproteinases, PDGF – platelet derived growth factor, TAM – Tumor associated macrophage, TC- tumor cell, TGF- β – transforming growth factor beta, TNF- α – tumor necrosis factor alpha, VEGF/ VEGF-A - vascular endothelial growth factor (A),
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Depiction of tumor evolution.
Shown is a theoretical illustration of tumor growth and evolution demonstrating how some of the different modes of tumor promotion and evolution in response to therapy may occur and evolve concurrently. Abbreviations: CAF- Cancer associated Fibroblast, EMT – epithelial to mesenchymal transition, miRNA- micro-RNA, TAM – Tumor associated macrophage, TGF- β – transforming growth factor beta, TNF- α – tumor necrosis factor alpha
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Biological and learning based molecular treatment of cancer.
Depiction of a clinical trial design in which tumors and cfDNA are evaluated longitudinally during treatment to tailored therapy combinations based on the evolution of the persistent, or emergent clonal populations identified during active treatment and before treatment resistance is detected using more conventional clinical or radiographic assessments. Abbreviations: cfDNA – cell-free DNA, IO – immunotherapy, TMB – tumor mutation burden, epi – epigenetically targeted agent.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Clonal predominance in alternating therapy
Depiction of clonal predominance switching during alternating treatment with 2 different EGFR TKI therapies to maintain a steady state population until outgrowth of a clonal population resistant to both therapies occurs, at which point a new therapy would be employed.

References

    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000;100(1):57–70. - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144(5):646–74 doi 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Math M, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366(10):883–92 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pisco AO, Brock A, Zhou J, Moor A, Mojtahedi M, Jackson D, et al. Non-Darwinian dynamics in therapy-induced cancer drug resistance. Nature communications 2013;4:2467 doi 10.1038/ncomms3467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardelli A, Parsons DW, Silliman N, Ptak J, Szabo S, Saha S, et al. Mutational analysis of the tyrosine kinome in colorectal cancers. Science 2003;300(5621):949 doi 10.1126/science.1082596. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types