The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons
- PMID: 30994075
- PMCID: PMC6738931
- DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840484
The Role of Participants in a Medical Information Commons
Abstract
Meaningful participant engagement has been identified as a key contributor to the success of efforts to share data via a "Medical Information Commons" (MIC). We present findings from expert stakeholder interviews aimed at understanding barriers to engagement and the appropriate role of MIC participants. Although most interviewees supported engagement, they distinguished between individual versus collective forms. They also noted challenges including representation and perceived inefficiency, prompting reflection on political aspects of engagement and efficiency concerns.
References
-
- Deverka PA, Majumder MA, Villanueva AG, and Anderson M et al. , “Creating a Data Resource: What Will It Take to Build a Medical Information Commons?” Genome Medicine 9, no. 84 (2017): 1–5, available at <https://genome-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13073-017-04...> (last visited January 9, 2019); - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- McGuire AL, Majumder MA, Villanueva AG, and Bardill J et al. , “Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 12–20; - PMC - PubMed
- Bollinger JM, Zuk PD, Majumder MA, and Versalovic E et al. , “What Is a Medical Information Commons?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 41–50; - PMC - PubMed
- Blassime A and Vayena E, “Becoming Partners, Retaining Autonomy: Ethical Considerations on the Development of Precision Medicine,” BMC Medical Ethics 17 (2016): 67. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hess C and Ostrom E, “Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons,” In Hess C and Ostrom E, Eds., Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007): 3–26,
-
at 7. Hess and Ostrom note that “[c]ommons is an awkward word in the English language” because the “same word is used for both the singular and plural forms.” Id., at 21.
-
-
For more on MIC structure and characteristics, see Cook-Deegan R et al. , “Introduction: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 7–11; Bollinger, supra note 2; Villanueva AG, Cook-Deegan R, Koenig BA, and Deverka PA et al. , “Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 21–30; and Majumder MA, Zuk PD, and McGuire AL, “Medical Information Commons,” in Hudson B, Rosenbloom J, and Cole D, eds., Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons (Rout-ledge, Forthcoming; 2019).
-
-
- See, e.g., Kaye J et al. , “From Patients to Partners: Participant-centric Initiatives in Biomedical Research,” Nature Reviews Genetics 13, no. 5 (2012): 371–376, available at < 10.1038/nrg3218> (last visited January 10, 2019); - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Sheridan S et al. , “The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research,” Annals of Family Medicine 15, no. 2 (2017): 165–170; - PMC - PubMed
- Ellis LE and Kass NE, “How Are PCORI-funded Researchers Engaging Patients in Research and What Are the Ethical Implications?” American Journal of Bioethics Empirical Bioethics 8, no. 1 (2017): 1–10; - PubMed
- Nelson E et al. , “Patient-Focused Registries Can Improve Health, Care, and Science,” BMJ 354 (2016); - PMC - PubMed
- Ferryman K and Pitcan M, “Fairness in Precision Medicine,” Data & Society Research Institute (February 2, 2018) available at <https://datasociety.net/pubs/pm/DataSociety_Fairness_In_Precision_Medici...> (last visited January 10, 2019).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources