Three-dimensional therapy needle applicator segmentation for ultrasound-guided focal liver ablation

Abstract

Purpose: Minimally invasive procedures, such as microwave ablation, are becoming first-line treatment options for early-stage liver cancer due to lower complication rates and shorter recovery times than conventional surgical techniques. Although these procedures are promising, one reason preventing widespread adoption is inadequate local tumor ablation leading to observations of higher local cancer recurrence compared to conventional procedures. Poor ablation coverage has been associated with two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) guidance of the therapy needle applicators and has stimulated investigation into the use of three-dimensional (3D) US imaging for these procedures. We have developed a supervised 3D US needle applicator segmentation algorithm using a single user input to augment the addition of 3D US to the current focal liver tumor ablation workflow with the goals of identifying and improving needle applicator localization efficiency.

Methods: The algorithm is initialized by creating a spherical search space of line segments around a manually chosen seed point that is selected by a user on the needle applicator visualized in a 3D US image. The most probable trajectory is chosen by maximizing the count and intensity of threshold voxels along a line segment and is filtered using the Otsu method to determine the tip location. Homogeneous tissue mimicking phantom images containing needle applicators were used to optimize the parameters of the algorithm prior to a four-user investigation on retrospective 3D US images of patients who underwent microwave ablation for liver cancer. Trajectory, axis localization, and tip errors were computed based on comparisons to manual segmentations in 3D US images.

Results: Segmentation of needle applicators in ten phantom 3D US images was optimized to median (Q1, Q3) trajectory, axis, and tip errors of 2.1 (1.1, 3.6)°, 1.3 (0.8, 2.1) mm, and 1.3 (0.7, 2.5) mm, respectively, with a mean ± SD segmentation computation time of 0.246 ± 0.007 s. Use of the segmentation method with a 16 in vivo 3D US patient dataset resulted in median (Q1, Q3) trajectory, axis, and tip errors of 4.5 (2.4, 5.2)°, 1.9 (1.7, 2.1) mm, and 5.1 (2.2, 5.9) mm based on all users.

Conclusions: Segmentation of needle applicators in 3D US images during minimally invasive liver cancer therapeutic procedures could provide a utility that enables enhanced needle applicator guidance, placement verification, and improved clinical workflow. A semi-automated 3D US needle applicator segmentation algorithm used in vivo demonstrated localization of the visualized trajectory and tip with less than 5° and 5.2 mm errors, respectively, in less than 0.31 s. This offers the ability to assess and adjust needle applicator placements intraoperatively to potentially decrease the observed liver cancer recurrence rates associated with current ablation procedures. Although optimized for deep and oblique angle needle applicator insertions, this proposed workflow has the potential to be altered for a variety of image-guided minimally invasive procedures to improve localization and verification of therapy needle applicators intraoperatively.

Keywords: 3D needle applicator segmentation; ablation; liver cancer; minimally invasive; percutaneous.