Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 17;13(4):e0007313.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007313. eCollection 2019 Apr.

Competence of non-human primates to transmit Leishmania infantum to the invertebrate vector Lutzomyia longipalpis

Affiliations

Competence of non-human primates to transmit Leishmania infantum to the invertebrate vector Lutzomyia longipalpis

Ayisa Rodrigues de Oliveira et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a zoonotic disease of worldwide relevance. Visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in Brazil, where it is caused by Leishmania infantum with Lutzomyia longipalpis being the most important invertebrate vector. Non-human primates are susceptible to L. infantum infection. However, little is known about the role of these species as reservoirs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the transmissibility potential of visceral leishmaniasis by non-human primates through xenodiagnosis using the phlebotomine Lu. longipalpis as well as to identify phlebotomine species prevalent in the area where the primates were kept in captivity, and assess infection by Leishmania in captured phlebotomine specimens. Fifty two non-human primates kept in captivity in an endemic area for leishmaniasis were subjected to xenodiagnosis. All primates were serologically tested for detection of anti-Leishmania antibodies. Additionally, an anti-Lu. longipalpis saliva ELISA was performed. Sand flies fed on all animals were tested by qPCR to identify and quantify L. infantum promastigotes. Eight of the 52 non-human primates were positive by xenodiagnosis, including three Pan troglodytes, three Leontopithecus rosalia, one Sapajus apella, and one Miopithecus talapoin, with estimated numbers of promastigotes ranging from 5.67 to 1,181.93 per μg of DNA. Positive animals had higher levels of IgG anti-Lu. longipalpis saliva when compared to negative animals, prior to xenodiagnosis. Captive non-human primates are capable of infecting Lu. longipalpis with L. infantum. Our findings also demonstrate the relevance of non-human primates as sentinels to zoonotic diseases. Several phlebotomine species, including Lu. longipalpis, have been identified in the area where the primates were maintained, but only one pool of Lutzomyia lenti was infected with L. infantum. This study has implications for public health strategies and conservation medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Transmission of Leishmania infantum from non-human primates to Lutzomyia longipalpis.
Ratio of positive and negative sand flies (n = 10) exposed to each of the positive animals, and tested for detection L. infantum DNA by qPCR.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Quantitative analysis of Leishmania infantum in Lutzomyia longipalpis exposed to non-human primates.
Relative quantification of L. infantum promastigotes in each individual positive sand fly according to the non-human primate species. Symbols refer to individual animals: open symbols indicate negative sand flies, and solid symbols indicate infected sand flies.
Fig 3
Fig 3. ELISA anti- Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva.
(A) O.D. from each non-human primate evaluated distributed according their families. (B) O.D. from non-human primates grouped in positive and negative to Leishmania spp. by xenodiagnosis. Positive animals had statistically significant higher O.D. values when compared to negative animals (*p = 0.0049 –Mann-Whitney test). Line represents the median and dots indicate individual values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Expert Committee on the control of leishmaniasis. 2010. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44412/1/WHO_TRS_949_eng.pdf.
    1. Lukes J, Mauricio IL, Schonian G. Evolutionary and geographical history of the Leishmania donovani complex with a revision of current taxonomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2007; 22: 9375–9380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lainson R, Rangel EF. Lutzomyia longipalpis and the eco-epidemiology of American visceral leishmaniasis, with particular reference to Brazil—A Review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005; 100 (8): 811–827. - PubMed
    1. Patz JA, Githeko AK, McCarty JP, Hussein S, Confaalonieri U, Wet N. Climate change and infectious disease In: McMichel AJ, Campbell-Lendrum DH, Corvalán CF, Ebi KL, Githeko AK, Scheraga JD, Woodwrd A, editors. Climate change and human health Risks and Responses. Genebra: WHO Library; 2003. pp 103–132.
    1. Diniz SA, Silva FL, Carvalho NAV, Bueno R, Guerra RMSNC, Abreu-Silva AL, et al. Animal reservoirs for visceral leishmaniasis in densely populated urban areas. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008; 2: 24–33. - PubMed

Publication types