Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 17;14(4):e0215147.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215147. eCollection 2019.

Interactive biomedical ontology matching

Affiliations

Interactive biomedical ontology matching

Xingsi Xue et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Due to continuous evolution of biomedical data, biomedical ontologies are becoming larger and more complex, which leads to the existence of many overlapping information. To support semantic inter-operability between ontology-based biomedical systems, it is necessary to identify the correspondences between these information, which is commonly known as biomedical ontology matching. However, it is a challenge to match biomedical ontologies, which dues to: (1) biomedical ontologies often possess tens of thousands of entities, (2) biomedical terminologies are complex and ambiguous. To efficiently match biomedical ontologies, in this paper, an interactive biomedical ontology matching approach is proposed, which utilizes the Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) to implement the automatic matching process, and gets a user involved in the evolving process to improve the matching efficiency. In particular, we propose an Evolutionary Tabu Search (ETS) algorithm, which can improve EA's performance by introducing the tabu search algorithm as a local search strategy into the evolving process. On this basis, we further make the ETS-based ontology matching technique cooperate with the user in a reasonable amount of time to efficiently create high quality alignments, and make use of EA's survival of the fittest to eliminate the wrong correspondences brought by erroneous user validations. The experiment is conducted on the Anatomy track and Large Biomedic track that are provided by the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), and the experimental results show that our approach is able to efficiently exploit the user intervention to improve its non-interactive version, and the performance of our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art semi-automatic ontology matching systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Interactive biomedical ontology matching framework.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • CMAT: ClinVar Mapping and Annotation Toolkit.
    Shen A, Barbero MC, Koylass B, Tsukanov K, Cezard T, Keane TM. Shen A, et al. Bioinform Adv. 2024 Feb 7;4(1):vbae018. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae018. eCollection 2024. Bioinform Adv. 2024. PMID: 38384863 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Consortium GO. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32(suppl_1):D258–D261. 10.1093/nar/gkh036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Golbeck J, Fragoso G, Hartel F, Hendler J, Oberthaler J, Parsia B. The National Cancer Institute’s thesaurus and ontology. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 2011;1(1):1–5.
    1. Rosse C, Mejino JL Jr. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2003;36(6):478–500. 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulz S, Cornet R, Spackman K. Consolidating SNOMED CT’s ontological commitment. Applied ontology. 2011;6(1):1–11.
    1. Lopez-Fernandez H, Reboiro-Jato M, Glez-Pena D, Aparicio F, Gachet D, Buenaga M, et al. BioAnnote: A software platform for annotating biomedical documents with application in medical learning environments. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2013;111(1):139–147. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.03.007 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types