Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;110(3-4):185-197.
doi: 10.1159/000500202. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

Blood Chromogranin A Is Not Effective as a Biomarker for Diagnosis or Management of Bronchopulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors/Neoplasms

Affiliations

Blood Chromogranin A Is Not Effective as a Biomarker for Diagnosis or Management of Bronchopulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors/Neoplasms

Somer Matar et al. Neuroendocrinology. 2020.

Abstract

Background: Identification of circulating tumor markers for clinical management in bronchopulmonary (BP) neuroendocrine tumors/neoplasms (NET/NEN) is of considerable clinical interest. Chromogranin A (CgA), a "universal" NET biomarker, is considered controversial as a circulating biomarker of BPNEN.

Aim: Assess utility of CgA in the diagnosis and management of BPNEN in a multicentric study.

Material and methods: CgA diagnostic metrics were assessed in lung NET/NENs (n = 200) and controls (n = 140), randomly assigned to a Training and Test set (100 BPC and 70 controls in each). Assay specificity was evaluated in neoplastic lung disease (n = 137) and nonneoplastic lung disease (n = 77). CgA efficacy in predicting clinical status was evaluated in the combined set of 200 NET/NENs. CgA levels in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumor (BPNET) subtypes (atypical [AC] vs. typical [TC]) and grade was examined. The clinical utility of an alteration of CgA levels (±25%) was evaluated in a subset of 49 BPNET over 12 months. CgA measurement was by NEOLISATM kit (EuroDiagnostica).

Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the training set were 41/98%, respectively. Test set data were 42/87%. Training set area under receiver operator characteristic analysis differentiated BPC from control area under the curve (AUC) 0.61 ± 0.05 p = 0.015. Test set the data were AUC 0.58 ± 0.05, p = 0.076. In the combined set (n = 200), 67% BPNET/NEN (n = 134) had normal CgA levels. CgA levels did not distinguish histological subtypes (TC vs. AC, AUC 0.56 ± 0.04, p = 0.21), grade (p = 0.45-0.72), or progressive from stable disease (AUC 0.53 ± 0.05 p = 0.47). There was no correlation of CgA with Ki-67 index (Pearson r = 0.143, p = 0.14). For nonneoplastic diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis), CgA was elevated in 26-37%. For neoplastic disease (NSCLC, squamous cell carcinoma), CgA was elevated in 11-16%. The neuroendocrine SCLC also exhibited elevated CgA (50%). Elevated CgA was not useful for differentiating BPNET/NEN from these other pathologies. Monitoring BPNET/NEN over a 12-month period identified neither CgA levels per se nor changes in CgA were reflective of somatostatin analog treatment outcome/efficacy or the natural history of the disease (progression).

Conclusions: Blood CgA levels are not clinically useful as a biomarker for lung BPNET/NEN. The low specificity and elevations in both nonneoplastic as well as other common neoplastic lung diseases identified limited clinical utility for this biomarker.

Keywords: Biomarker; Bronchopulmonary; Carcinoid; Chromogranin A; Diagnosis; Lung; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CgA levels in BPNET/NEN training and test sets. a Training set CgA levels: In BPNET/NEN, mean level was elevated versus controls (* p < 0.01). In the test set, mean BPNET/NEN level was not different to controls (p = 0.2). b The AUC for differentiating BPNET/NEN from controls for the training set was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53–0.69, p = 0.015) and for the test set was 0.58 (95% CI 0.50–0.66, p = 0.076). c CgA levels were elevated in 33% (n = 66) of the 200 BPNET/NEN. The remaining 134 (67%) samples fell within normal levels (≤108 ng/mL). CgA, chromogranin A.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
CgA levels in benign and malignant lung disease. a Mean CgA level in COPD (n = 27) was elevated (p = 0.0037) compared to controls (n = 140). Mean level in ACC (n = 62) was not elevated (p = 0.55), but the mean level was increased (p = 0.045) in SCC (n = 43). ACC and SCC CgA levels were significantly less than COPD (p < 0.005). IPF (n = 50) had elevated mean level compared to controls (p = 0.038). SCLC (n = 32) also exhibited elevated levels compared to controls (p < 0.0001). b AUC analysis could not differentiate COPD or IPF from BPNET/NEN (AUC 0.52–0.54, p = 0.48–64), and the AUC between ACC and SCC and BPNET/NEN was not statistically significant (AUC 0.61–0.63, p = 0.06). SCLC likewise could not be differentiated from BPNET/NEN (AUC 0.56, p = 0.23). CgA, chromogranin A; ACC, adenocarcinoma cell carcinoma; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; BPNET, bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumor.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
CgA measurement in histological variants and grades of BPNET/NEN. a Mean CgA level was significantly elevated (* p < 0.005) for AC (n = 84) but not TC (n = 116), compared with controls (n = 140). Both TC and AC had a similar proportion (30 and 36%, respectively) of elevated levels. b AUC analysis could not differentiate CgA levels between TC and AC (AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.47–0.64, p = 0.21). c CgA levels between Grade 1 (Ki67 <4%; n = 67) and Grade 2 (Ki67: 5–24%; n = 39) BPC were not statistically significant (p = 0.45). Grade 3 (Ki67 >24%; n = 4) was lower but this was not statistically different (p = 0.56–0.72) compared to Grade 1 and 2. d The relationship between Ki-67 grading and CgA levels was not significant (Pearson r = 0.143, p = 0.136). CgA, chromogranin A; TC, typical; AC, atypical; AUC, area under the curve.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Assessment of CgA in stable and PD. a Mean CgA level between SD (n = 145) and PD (n = 55) was not significant (p = 0.47). Mean levels in SD and PD were increased (* p = 0.018–0.048) compared with controls (n = 140). Both SD and PD had a similar proportion (32 and 31%, respectively) of elevated levels. b AUC analysis for differentiating SD from PD was not statistically significant (AUC 0.53, 95% CI 0.44–0.62, p = 0.47). CgA, chromogranin A; PD, progressive disease; AUC, area under the curve.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Clinical utility of CgA and BPNET/NEN monitoring. a CgA levels of 22 patients with progressive disease either treated with SSA (n = 16) or not treated (n = 6) over a 12-month period. b Spider plot analysis identified a significant difference (increase, p = 0.0021) of SSA treatment on CgA. c CgA levels of 27 patients with SD either treated with SSA (n = 4) or not treated (n = 23) over a 12-month period. d Spider plot analysis was unable to differentiate an impact of therapy (p = 0.84) over the evaluation period. CgA, chromogranin A.

References

    1. Henry NL, Hayes DF. Cancer biomarkers. Mol Oncol. 2012. April;6(2):140–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strimbu K, Tavel JA. What are biomarkers? Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010. November;5(6):463–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. i H, Cho JY; I H. Lung Cancer Biomarkers. Adv Clin Chem. 2015;72:107–70. - PubMed
    1. Duffy MJ. Use of Biomarkers in Screening for Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:27–39. - PubMed
    1. Oberg K, Modlin IM, De Herder W, Pavel M, Klimstra D, Frilling A, et al. Consensus on biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumour disease. Lancet Oncol. 2015. September;16(9):e435–46. - PMC - PubMed