Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 13;8(1):e000377.
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000377. eCollection 2019.

Contribution of adverse events to death of hospitalised patients

Ellinor Christin Haukland  1   2 , Kjersti Mevik  2   3 , Christian von Plessen  4   5 , Carsten Nieder  1   6 , Barthold Vonen  2   7
Affiliations

Contribution of adverse events to death of hospitalised patients

Ellinor Christin Haukland et al. BMJ Open Qual. .

Abstract

Background: There is no standardised method to investigate death as a patient safety indicator and we need valid and reliable measurements to use adverse events contributing to death as a quality measure.

Objective: To investigate the contribution of severe adverse events to death in hospitalised patients and clarify methodological differences using the Global Trigger Tool method on all inpatient deaths compared with a sample of general hospitalised patients.

Method: Retrospective records reviewing using the Global Trigger Tool method.

Results: In 0.3% of hospital admissions, adverse events contribute to inpatient death. Patients who die in hospital have twice the rate of adverse events per 1000 patient days compared with general patients, 76.7 vs 36.5 (p<0.001, RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.47). Patients dying in hospital experience seven times the rate of severe adverse events, 38.4% vs 5.2% (p<0.001, RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.47). For 86 out of 377 inpatient deaths, the adverse event is so severe that it contributes to death. 27.9% of severe adverse events contributing to death originate in primary care. Lower respiratory infections (p<0.001, RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.76 to 4.51), medication harm (p<0.001, RR 5.21, 95% CI 3.04 to 8.94) and pressure ulcers (p=0.04, RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.85) are significantly more frequent for inpatient deaths than in the general sample of hospital patients.

Conclusions: Patients dying in hospitals experience seven times the rate of severe adverse events. Reviewing all inpatient death by the Global Trigger Tool method discloses new valid and reliable data of severe adverse events contributing to death which otherwise would be undetected.

Keywords: adverse events; global trigger tool; in-patient deaths; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study population and design. GTT, Global Trigger Tool.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016;353:i2139 10.1136/bmj.i2139 - DOI - PubMed
    1. James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf 2013;9:122–8. 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB, et al. . Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2124–34. 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F, et al. . ‘Global trigger tool’ shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff 2011;30:581–9. 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baines RJ, Langelaan M, de Bruijne MC, et al. . Is researching adverse events in hospital deaths a good way to describe patient safety in hospitals: a retrospective patient record review study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007380 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007380 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types