Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;34(7):1167-1173.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04951-6.

A Brief Communication Curriculum Improves Resident and Nurse Communication Skills and Patient Satisfaction

Affiliations

A Brief Communication Curriculum Improves Resident and Nurse Communication Skills and Patient Satisfaction

Jill Allenbaugh et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Despite the ever-expanding role that the patient experience plays in healthcare, effective strategies proven to increase patient satisfaction ratings remain scarce. At the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, we identified patient-doctor and patient-nurse communication as an area for intervention to improve suboptimal patient satisfaction among medicine inpatients. We posited that the likely reasons for underperformance in this area were a lack of adequate training in bedside communication skills.

Design: We developed and evaluated a curriculum for medicine residents and nurses focused on clear communication at the bedside. A total of 76 internal medicine residents and 85 medical service nurses participated in 2016. The curriculum utilized didactics, video demonstrations, and role play, and was evaluated using pre- and post-surveys of participants' health literacy knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. Communication skills were evaluated using pre- and post-direct observation at the bedside with a communication skills checklist. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores were compared 3 months before and after the curriculum to assess changes in patient satisfaction.

Key results: Knowledge and attitudes improved significantly for both residents and nurses. Residents' and nurses' observed clinical communication skills improved significantly in most domains, and there was moderate increase in communication-specific HCAHPS scores.

Conclusion: A small investment of curricular time devoted to clear communication skills improved residents' and medical nurses' knowledge, attitudes, skills, and communication-specific HCAHPS scores. This curriculum, focused on improving bedside communication skills, could be implemented in a variety of settings to improve patient satisfaction and patient experience.

Keywords: communication skills; health literacy; medical education; medical education–curriculum development/evaluation; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage change in pre-intervention time period vs post-intervention time period “top-box” HCAHPS scores in physician and nurse communication (corresponding to answer choice of “Always”) from patients discharged from medical (intervention participants) and surgical (non-participants) wards. “Overall communication” represents the average of the top-box HCAHPS scores for the doctor- and nurse-specific communication HCAHPS questions. “Explained” represents the HCAHPS item, “Your doctor/nurse explained things to you in a way you could understand.” “Listened” represents the HCAHPS item, “Your doctor/nurse listened carefully to you.” “Courtesy and Respect” represents the HCAHPS item, “Your doctor/nurse treated you with courtesy and respect.” “Understanding Medication” represents the HCAHPS item, “When I left the hospital, I clearly understood the purpose for taking each of my medications.” “Understanding Health” represents the HCAHPS item, “When I left the hospital, I had a good understanding of the things I was responsible for in managing my health.” Figure 1 contains poor quality of text inside the artwork. Please do not re-use the file that we have rejected or attempt to increase its resolution and re-save. It is originally poor, therefore, increasing the resolution will not solve the quality problem. We suggest that you provide us the original format. We prefer replacement figures containing vector/editable objects rather than embedded images. Preferred file formats are eps, ai, tiff and pdf.Unfortunately none of my colleagues or I have the ability to change the figure. I have attempted to make a new copy from the source data, please let me know if this is better, or if it will still be an issue.Thank you.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97–107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Street RL, Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital Value-Based Purchasing. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Inst.... Accessed October 1, 2018.
    1. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, HCAHPS: Patients’ Perspectives of Care Survey 2017; https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Inst.... Accessed October 1, 2018.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources