Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 18;4(2):e11590.
doi: 10.2196/11590.

Experiences of Patients With a Diabetes Self-Care App Developed Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model: Before-and-After Study

Affiliations

Experiences of Patients With a Diabetes Self-Care App Developed Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model: Before-and-After Study

Eunjoo Jeon et al. JMIR Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: Mobile phones have been actively used in various ways for diabetes self-care. Mobile phone apps can manage lifestyle factors such as diet, exercise, and medication without time or place restrictions. A systematic review has found these apps to be effective in reducing blood glucose. However, the existing apps were developed and evaluated without a theoretical framework to explain the process of changes in diabetes self-care behaviors.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diabetes self-care app that we developed by measuring differences in diabetes self-care factors between before and after using the app with the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model of Diabetes Self-Care (IMB-DSC).

Methods: We conducted a single-group pre- and postintervention study with a convenience sample of diabetes patients. A total of 38 adult patients with diabetes who had an Android smartphone were recruited. After conducting a preliminary survey of those who agreed to participate in the study, we provided them with a manual and a tutorial video about the diabetes self-care app. The app has functions for education, recommendations, writing a diary, recording, goal setting, sharing, communication, feedback, and interfacing with a glucometer, and it was applied for 4 weeks. We measured the general characteristics of participants, their history of diabetes self-care app usage, IMB-DSC factors, and blood glucose levels. The IMB-DSC factors of information, personal motivation, social motivation, behavioral skills, and behaviors were measured using an assessment tool consisting of 87 items extracted from the Diabetes Knowledge Test, third version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale, Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist, and Diabetes Self-Management Assessment Report Tool.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 43.87 years. A total 30 participants out of 38 (79%) had type 2 diabetes and 8 participants (21%) had type 1 diabetes. The most frequently used app function was recording, which was used by 34 participants out of 38 (89%). Diabetes self-care behaviors (P=.02) and diabetes self-care social motivation (P=.05) differed significantly between pre- and postintervention, but there was no significant difference in diabetes self-care information (P=.85), diabetes self-care personal motivation (P=.57), or diabetes self-care behavioral skills (P=.89) between before and after using the diabetes self-care app.

Conclusions: Diabetes self-care social motivation was significantly improved with our diabetes self-care app by sharing experiences and sympathizing with other diabetes patients. Diabetes self-care behavior was also significantly improved with the diabetes self-care app by providing an interface with a glucometer that removes the effort of manual input. Diabetes self-care information, diabetes self-care personal motivation, and diabetes self-care behavioral skills were not significantly improved. However, they will be improved with additional offline interventions such as reflective listening and simulation.

Keywords: blood glucose self-monitoring; diabetes mellitus; mobile applications; self-management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research process applied in this study. DSM: diabetes self-management; IMB-DSC: Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model of Diabetes Self-Care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The modified Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model of Diabetes Self-Care.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationships between the research framework and the diabetes self-care app intervention. IMB-DSC: Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model of Diabetes Self-Care.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The result of path analysis for Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model of Diabetes Self-Care. Asterisk signifies significance at P<.05 and double asterisk signifies significance at P<.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Korean Diabetes Fact Sheet 2015. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association; 2015. [2019-04-15]. http://www.diabetes.or.kr/temp/KDA_fact_sheet%202015.pdf .
    1. Gojka R. Global Report On Diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. [2019-04-15]. https://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/
    1. Newman S, Steed E, Mulligan K. Chronic Physical Illness: Self Management and Behavioural Interventions. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2008.
    1. Song M, Lee M, Shim B. Barriers to and facilitators of self-management adherence in Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes. Int J Older People Nurs. 2010 Sep;5(3):211–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00189.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00189.x. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Association of Diabetes Educators AADE Guidelines for the Practice of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Training (DSME/T) Diabetes Educ. 2009 Nov 24;35(3_suppl):85S–107S. doi: 10.1177/0145721709352436. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources