Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 18;3(2):e10688.
doi: 10.2196/10688.

Implementing Web-Based Interventions in HIV Primary Care Clinics: Pilot Implementation Evaluation of Positive Health Check

Camilla Harshbarger  1 , Olivia Burrus  2 , Brittany A Zulkiewicz  2 , Alexa M Ortiz  3 , Carla A Galindo  1 , Bryan R Garner  4 , Robert D Furberg  3 , Megan A Lewis  2
Affiliations

Implementing Web-Based Interventions in HIV Primary Care Clinics: Pilot Implementation Evaluation of Positive Health Check

Camilla Harshbarger et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Web-based interventions can help people living with HIV achieve better clinical outcomes and behaviors, but integrating them into clinical practice remains challenging. There is a gap in understanding the feasibility of implementing these interventions in HIV clinic settings from the clinicians' perspective.

Objective: The goal of the research was to determine whether Positive Health Check (PHC)-a Web-based, tailored video counseling tool focused on increasing patient adherence and retention in care and reducing HIV risk among HIV-positive patients-was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for HIV primary care clinic staff to implement in clinic workflows.

Methods: A multiple-case study design was used to evaluate the pilot implementation. Four primary care clinics located in the southeastern United States implemented PHC over a 1-month period. Nine clinic staff across the clinics participated in structured interviews before, during, and after the implementation. In total, 54 interviews were conducted. We used a framework analysis approach to code the data and identify themes related to implementation outcomes, including acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We also analyzed patient intervention use metrics (n=104) to quantify patient intervention completion rates (n=68).

Results: Overall, clinicians viewed PHC as acceptable and appropriate. Themes that emerged related to these implementation outcomes include the ability for PHC to increase provider-patient communication and its ability to engage patients due to the tailored and interactive design. While generally feasible to implement, challenges to the clinic workflow and physical environment were areas that clinics needed to manage to make PHC work in their clinics.

Conclusions: Findings from this pilot implementation suggest that clinical staff viewed PHC as acceptable and appropriate, especially as more patients used the intervention over the pilot period. Feasibility of implementation was challenging in some cases, and lessons learned from this pilot implementation can provide information for larger scale tests of the intervention that include assessment of both implementation outcomes and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: attitudes; internet; patient care; public health practice; vulnerable populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Positive Health Check patient experience flow diagram. IDU: injection drug use; MTCT: mother-to-child transmission.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fisher JD, Amico KR, Fisher WA, Cornman DH, Shuper PA, Trayling C, Redding C, Barta W, Lemieux AF, Altice FL, Dieckhaus K, Friedland G. Computer-based intervention in HIV clinical care setting improves antiretroviral adherence: the LifeWindows Project. AIDS Behav. 2011 Nov;15(8):1635–1646. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9926-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbert P, Ciccarone D, Gansky SA, Bangsberg DR, Clanon K, McPhee SJ, Calderón SH, Bogetz A, Gerbert B. Interactive "Video Doctor" counseling reduces drug and sexual risk behaviors among HIV-positive patients in diverse outpatient settings. PLoS One. 2008 Apr 23;3(4):e1988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001988. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001988 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins CB, Hearn KD, Whittier DN, Freeman A, Stallworth JD, Phields M. Implementing packaged HIV-prevention interventions for HIV-positive individuals: considerations for clinic-based and community-based interventions. Public Health Rep. 2010;125 Suppl 1:55–63. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Govindasamy D, Ford N, Kranzer K. Risk factors, barriers and facilitators for linkage to antiretroviral therapy care: a systematic review. AIDS. 2012 Oct 23;26(16):2059–2067. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283578b9b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kempf M, McLeod J, Boehme AK, Walcott MW, Wright L, Seal P, Norton WE, Schumacher JE, Mugavero M, Moneyham L. A qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators to retention-in-care Among HIV-positive women in the rural southeastern united states: implications for targeted interventions. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2010 Aug;24(8):515–520. doi: 10.1089/apc.2010.0065. - DOI - PubMed