Student motivation to learn: is self-belief the key to transition and first year performance in an undergraduate health professions program?
- PMID: 30999916
- PMCID: PMC6471892
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1539-5
Student motivation to learn: is self-belief the key to transition and first year performance in an undergraduate health professions program?
Abstract
Background: Student motivation to learn has been undervalued to date though has been identified as an area influencing student success and retention at university. The transition into university has been highlighted as a key period affecting student outcomes as well as well-being. Early identification of those students at risk may assist the transition for many students moving into higher education. Previous research has identified the Motivation and Engagement Scale - University/College (MES-UC) as a valid instrument for measuring motivation to learn in physiotherapy students. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between a student's motivation to learn on entry into an undergraduate physiotherapy program and their performance through first year. The relationship of admissions scores, to motivation to learn on entry, were also considered, to determine any link between these measures.
Methods: An observational longitudinal study was conducted on one cohort of undergraduate physiotherapy students commencing their studies in 2015 with a response rate of 67%. Correlations were performed between admission variables and Year 1 MES-UC scoring; and between Year 1 MES-UC scoring and subsequent academic performance across first year, taking into consideration gender and age.
Results: Self-belief was identified as the key dimension of motivation influencing student success in the transition into university. Results identified the link between self-belief scores on entry and academic performance in first year, including grade point average and performance in six of nine courses. Courses where there was no significant relationship were identified as curriculum areas where students may be less motivated. There was a relationship between the admissions interview and MES-UC scoring, demonstrating a link between non-cognitive selection measures and student motivation to learn on entry into the program.
Conclusion: Motivation to learn and specifically self-belief with learning, may be influential in the transition into higher education. Undertaking measures of academic motivation may be useful to determine student engagement with curriculum, through identifying any link between student self-belief and performance in specific courses. Changes to curriculum based on student motivation as well as targeting early those students with reduced self-belief may improve student success, psychosocial wellbeing and retention.
Keywords: Admissions; Curriculum; Higher education; Motivation to learn; Self-belief; Transition.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was gained for this study from The University of Notre Dame Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 014168F). Students consented to participate through completion of a consent form and recorded their student number as an identifier. Consent to add admissions data to the study was sought retrospectively following initial data collection.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Identifying the influence of gender on motivation and engagement levels in student physiotherapists.Med Teach. 2015 Apr;37(4):348-53. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.948829. Epub 2014 Sep 3. Med Teach. 2015. PMID: 25183421
-
Characteristics of student preparedness for clinical learning: clinical educator perspectives using the Delphi approach.BMC Med Educ. 2012 Nov 13;12:112. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-112. BMC Med Educ. 2012. PMID: 23145840 Free PMC article.
-
Level of and motivation for extracurricular activity are associated with academic performance in the veterinary curriculum.J Vet Med Educ. 2014 Autumn;41(3):275-83. doi: 10.3138/jvme.1213-163R. J Vet Med Educ. 2014. PMID: 24981424
-
Predicting Success for Student Physical Therapists on the National Physical Therapy Examination: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Phys Ther. 2020 Jan 23;100(1):73-89. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz145. Phys Ther. 2020. PMID: 31584670
-
Have motivation theories guided the development and reform of medical education curricula? A review of the literature.Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):735-43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cc0e. Acad Med. 2012. PMID: 22534597 Review.
Cited by
-
Developing a Social Determinants of Learning™ Framework: A Case Study.Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;42(4):205-211. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000810. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021. PMID: 33935243 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Low Pharmaceutical Calculation Performers Using an Algebra-Based Pretest.Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jan;86(1):8473. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8473. Epub 2021 May 19. Am J Pharm Educ. 2022. PMID: 35074852 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of community of inquiry and self-efficacy on student attitudes in sustained remote health professions learning environments.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04382-2. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37380947 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Motivation of First-Year Undergraduate Anatomy Students Through the Lens of Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A Single Institution Study.Med Sci Educ. 2023 Jul 5;33(4):945-953. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01823-x. eCollection 2023 Aug. Med Sci Educ. 2023. PMID: 37546207 Free PMC article.
-
Introduction of the Modified Neuroanatomy Motivation Questionnaire and Its Role in Comparing Medical Student Attitudes Towards Learning Neuroanatomy Between Neuro-enthusiasts and Standard Students.Med Sci Educ. 2021 Oct 14;31(6):1823-1830. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01371-2. eCollection 2021 Dec. Med Sci Educ. 2021. PMID: 34950528 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bradley D: Review of Australian higher education : final report. Canberra, A.C.T.: Dept of education employment and workplace relations; 2008.
-
- Vossensteyn J, Kottmann A, Jongbloed B, Kaiser F, Cremonini L, Stensaker B, Hovdhaugen E, Wollscheid S. Dropout and completion in higher education in Europe: main report. In. Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies: European Union. 2015.
-
- Severiens S, ten Dam G. Leaving college: a gender comparison in male and female-dominated programs. Res High Educ. 2012;53(4):453–470.
-
- Abdulghani HM, Al-Drees AA, Khalil MS, Ahmad F, Ponnamperuma GG, Amin Z. What factors determine academic achievement in high achieving undergraduate medical students? A qualitative study. Medical Teacher. 2014;36(1):S43–S48. - PubMed
-
- Martin AJ. School motivation of boys and girls: differences of degree, differences of kind, or both? Aust J Psychol. 2004;56(3):133–146.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous