Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners
- PMID: 30999936
- PMCID: PMC6471861
- DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0882-6
Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners
Abstract
Background: Collaborative care is an evidence-based program for treating depression in primary care. We sought to expand this model by recruiting clinics interested in incorporating community partners (i.e., community-based organizations (CBO) and/or family members) in the care team. Seven sites implemented evidence-based collaborative care programs with community partners while collecting information on costs of implementing and sustaining programs.
Methods: Sites retrospectively collected data on planning and implementation costs with technical assistance from study researchers. Sites also prospectively collected cost of care activities over a 1-month period once the program was implemented to determine resources needed to sustain programs. Personnel salary costs were adjusted, adding 30% for benefits and 30% for administrative overhead.
Results: The programs implemented varied considerably in staffing, involvement of care partners, and allocation of costs. Total planning and implementation costs varied from $39,280 to $60,575. The largest implementation cost category involved workflow development and ranged from $16,325 to $31,375 with the highest costs in this category attributed to the most successful implementation among clinic-CBO programs. Following implementation, cost per patient over the 1-month period ranged from $154 to $544. Ongoing strategic decision-making and administrative costs, which were included in cost of care, ranged from $284 to $2328 for the month.
Conclusions: Sites implemented collaborative care through differing partnerships, staffing, and related costs. Costs to implement and sustain programs developed in partnership are often not collected but are crucial to understanding financial aspects of developing sustainable partnerships. Assessing such costs is feasible and can inform future partnership efforts.
Keywords: Adaptation; Collaborative care implementation; Community partners; Depression; Family; Older adults.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The larger Care Partners evaluation was reviewed by the University of Washington and University of California Davis IRBs and determined to be exempt. The subsequently funded cost evaluation was discussed with the University of Washington IRB and self-determined to be exempt based on the larger parent grant’s exempt status.
Consent for publication
We consent to publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State.Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 12;13(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0818-6. Implement Sci. 2018. PMID: 30314522 Free PMC article.
-
The Costs and Cost-effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Adolescents With Depression in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 1;170(11):1048-1054. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1721. JAMA Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27654449 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost of implementing a community-based primary health care strengthening program: The case of the Ghana Essential Health Interventions Program in northern Ghana.PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211956. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30730961 Free PMC article.
-
The national improvement partnership network: state-based partnerships that improve primary care quality.Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.001. Acad Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 24268091 Review.
-
Does shared care help in the treatment of depression?Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Nov;22 Suppl 1:S18-22. Psychiatr Danub. 2010. PMID: 21057395 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges and recommendations for collecting and quantifying implementation costs in practice: a qualitative interview study.Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 11;5(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00648-y. Implement Sci Commun. 2024. PMID: 39394175 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping review of costs of implementation strategies in community, public health and healthcare settings.BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 28;12(6):e060785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060785. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35768106 Free PMC article.
-
Handoffs and transitions in critical care-understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.Implement Sci. 2021 Jun 15;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1. Implement Sci. 2021. PMID: 34130725 Free PMC article.
-
Missing link: a qualitative analysis of community-based organisations' contributions to partnered collaborative care to treat late-life depression.BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e074403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074403. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38670617 Free PMC article.
-
An Economic Analysis of the Implementation of Team-based Collaborative Care in Outpatient General Mental Health Clinics.Med Care. 2020 Oct;58(10):874-880. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001372. Med Care. 2020. PMID: 32732780 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases