Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 18;9(1):6271.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42754-1.

A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study of patients with Polar Type II/III complex shoulder instability

Affiliations

A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study of patients with Polar Type II/III complex shoulder instability

Anthony Howard et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The pathophysiology of Stanmore Classification Polar type II/III shoulder instability is not well understood. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging was used to measure brain activity in response to forward flexion and abduction in 16 patients with Polar Type II/III shoulder instability and 16 age-matched controls. When a cluster level correction was applied patients showed significantly greater brain activity than controls in primary motor cortex (BA4), supramarginal gyrus (BA40), inferior frontal gyrus (BA44), precentral gyrus (BA6) and middle frontal gyrus (BA6): the latter region is considered premotor cortex. Using voxel level correction within these five regions a unique activation was found in the primary motor cortex (BA4) at MNI coordinates -38 -26 56. Activation was greater in controls compared to patients in the parahippocampal gyrus (BA27) and perirhinal cortex (BA36). These findings show, for the first time, neural differences in patients with complex shoulder instability, and suggest that patients are in some sense working harder or differently to maintain shoulder stability, with brain activity similar to early stage motor sequence learning. It will help to understand the condition, design better therapies and improve treatment of this group; avoiding the common clinical misconception that their recurrent shoulder dislocations are a form of attention-seeking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Movements of forward flexion and abduction in the scanner [14].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neuronal activation for the cluster level analysis (FWE, P < 0.05) where activation is greater in (A) patients versus controls and (B) controls versus patients, for the response to all movement >rest. MNI coordinates are given (x, y, z mm) for the most significant voxel in the cluster. L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisphere. Colour (including colour bars) corresponds to T-scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bigliani LU, Kurzweil PR, Schwartzbach CC, Wolfe IN, Flatow EL. Inferior capsular shift procedure for anterior-inferior shoulder instability in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(5):578–84. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lewis A, Kitamura T, Bayley J. The Classification of Shoulder Instability:new light through old windows. Current Orthopaedics. 2004;18:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cuor.2004.04.002. - DOI
    1. Lewis J. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med. 2010;43:259–64. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052183. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuhn JE. A new classification system for shoulder instability. Br J Sports. 2010;44(5):341–6. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.071183. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaggi A, Lambert S. Rehabilitation for shoulder instability. Br J Sports. 2010;44(5):333–40. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.059311. - DOI - PubMed