Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 2:10:668.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00668. eCollection 2019.

Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice

Affiliations

Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice

Mark C Noort et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The investigation of people raising or withholding safety concerns, termed safety voice, has relied on report-based methodologies, with few experiments. Generalisable findings have been limited because: the behavioural nature of safety voice is rarely operationalised; the reliance on memory and recall has well-established biases; and determining causality requires experimentation. Across three studies, we introduce, evaluate and make available the first experimental paradigm for studying safety voice: the "Walking the plank" paradigm. This paradigm presents participants with an apparent hazard (walking across a weak wooden plank) to elicit safety voice behaviours, and it addresses the methodological shortfalls of report-based methodologies. Study 1 (n = 129) demonstrated that the paradigm can elicit observable safety voice behaviours in a safe, controlled and randomised laboratory environment. Study 2 (n = 69) indicated it is possible to elicit safety silence for a single hazard when safety concerns are assessed and alternative ways to address the hazard are absent. Study 3 (n = 75) revealed that manipulating risk perceptions results in changes to safety voice behaviours. We propose a distinction between two independent dimensions (concerned-unconcerned and voice-silence) which yields a 2 × 2 safety voice typology. Demonstrating the need for experimental investigations of safety voice, the results found a consistent mismatch between self-reported and observed safety voice. The discussion examines insights on conceptualising and operationalising safety voice behaviours in relationship to safety concerns, and suggests new areas for research: replicating empirical studies, understanding the behavioural nature of safety voice, clarifying the personal relevance of physical harm, and integrating safety voice with other harm-prevention behaviours. Our article adds to the conceptual strength of the safety voice literature and provides a methodology and typology for experimentally examining people raising safety concerns.

Keywords: behavioural observations; experimental methodologies; safety concerns; safety silence; safety voice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarts H., Custers R., Marien H. (2008). Preparing and motivating behavior outside of awareness. Science 319, 1639–1639. 10.1126/science.1150432 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anicich E. M., Swaab R. I., Galinsky A. D. (2015). Hierarchical cultural values predict success and mortality in high-stakes teams. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 112, 1338–1343. 10.1073/pnas.1408800112 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aubin D., King S. (2015). Developing a culture of safety: exploring students? perceptions of errors in an interprofessional setting. J. Interprof. Care 29, 646–648. 10.3109/13561820.2015.1045060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Q. 36, 421–458. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393203 (accessed March 20, 2019).
    1. Bartlett F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. (Cambridge: Social Psychology; ), 1–11.

LinkOut - more resources