Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 2:10:376.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00376. eCollection 2019.

Overcoming Self-Incompatibility in Diploid Potato Using CRISPR-Cas9

Affiliations

Overcoming Self-Incompatibility in Diploid Potato Using CRISPR-Cas9

Felix Enciso-Rodriguez et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Potato breeding can be redirected to a diploid inbred/F1 hybrid variety breeding strategy if self-compatibility can be introduced into diploid germplasm. However, the majority of diploid potato clones (Solanum spp.) possess gametophytic self-incompatibility that is primarily controlled by a single multiallelic locus called the S-locus which is composed of tightly linked genes, S-RNase (S-locus RNase) and multiple SLFs (S-locus F-box proteins), which are expressed in the style and pollen, respectively. Using S-RNase genes known to function in the Solanaceae gametophytic SI mechanism, we identified S-RNase alleles with flower-specific expression in two diploid self-incompatible potato lines using genome resequencing data. Consistent with the location of the S-locus in potato, we genetically mapped the S-RNase gene using a segregating population to a region of low recombination within the pericentromere of chromosome 1. To generate self-compatible diploid potato lines, a dual single-guide RNA (sgRNA) strategy was used to target conserved exonic regions of the S-RNase gene and generate targeted knockouts (KOs) using a Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) approach. Self-compatibility was achieved in nine S-RNase KO T0 lines which contained bi-allelic and homozygous deletions/insertions in both genotypes, transmitting self compatibility to T1 progeny. This study demonstrates an efficient approach to achieve stable, consistent self-compatibility through S-RNase KO for use in diploid potato breeding approaches.

Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; S-RNase; diploid potato; gene editing; self-incompatibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
S-RNase gene structure and allelic variants in diploid potato and related species. (A) S-RNase predicted amino-acid sequence alignment of the DM (Sp5) and RH (St5 and St6) alleles. Underlined regions in red represent the typical five conserved regions (C1 to C5) and two hypervariable regions (HVa and HVb) of the S-RNase gene family. Exon/intron boundary is indicated with a filled triangle within the HVa region (B) S-RNase gene structure. The S-RNase open reading frame is composed of two exons separated by one small intron. Zoomed-in regions are shown within dotted lines indicating the intronic and exonic regions used for RH-specific primer design within the reported S-RNase alleles. (C) Phylogenetic tree constructed using the Neighbor Joining method based in the proportion of S-RNase amino acid differences. S-RNase from Nicotiana sylvestris was used as out-group. Numbers above each branch represent bootstrapping percentages from1000 replications. (D) Pairwise amino acid similarity of S-RNase in Solanum species and detected S-RNase alleles. S-RNase alleles are represented first by a species name abbreviation followed by S and the allele number for Tuberosum (t) or Phureja (p) group in Solanum tuberosum. For other species, a similar pattern is used, and allele numbers or letters (i.e., Sx for P. hybrida) are added if reported. S. tub: S. tuberosum, S. chc: S. chacoense, S. neo: S. neorickii, P. int: P. integrifolia, P. hyb: P. hybrida, N. syl: N. sylvestris.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
S-RNase gene mapping in diploid potato. (A) RH S-RNase (S. tub_St6) allelic screening on the DRH F1 population using the S-RNase and housekeeping Sucrose synthase 3 gene (Sus-3) primers. DM and RH parental lines are shown in the first two lanes followed by the negative control (C), and the RH-S-RNase segregation pattern of 11 F1-derived lines. (B) The S-RNase gene mapped to 16.3 cM on the short arm near the centromeric region of chromosome 1 (red). (C) Marey map of physical (Mb) versus genetic (cM) distances from chromosome I showing the S-RNase gene within a low-recombination region (red box). Asterisks within the red box represent SNPs spanning the region between to 6.1 and 18.9 Mb in the potato physical map (solcap_snp_c2_27882 and solcap_snp_c1_16425 markers, respectively).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
CRISPR/Cas9 mediated mutagenesis in two self incompatible diploid potato lines. (A) Single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) designed to target the S-RNase exon1 (sgRNA 1) and exon 2 (sgRNA 2). Zoomed-in regions within the dotted lines show sgRNA and PAM sequences. (B) Seven and (C) three bi-allelic S-RNase knockouts (KOs) DRH-195 and DRH-310 T0 lines, respectively, detected by insertion/deletion polymorphisms compared to wild-type (WT) and negative controls (C). All DRH-195 KOs exhibit polymorphic deletions and DRH-310 monomorphic deletions (lines 195–105, 195–137, 195–142, and 195–160 presented a faint mutated or WT-like bands that is not observed in the figure). (D) Different mutation types detected by amplicon sequencing in selected KOs for DRH-195, and (E) DRH-310 T0 lines respectively. Wild-type S-RNase exhibiting selected sgRNAs (sgRNA1 and sgRNA2) and PAM sequences are shown at the top of each alignment. Different types of mutations including deletions (–), insertions (+), and inversions (i) detected in DM (DM) and RH (RH) S-RNase alleles of each T0 KO DRH-derived lines shown as ‘195-’ or ‘310-.’
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
S-RNase expression and KO phenotype in self incompatible diploid potato lines. (A) Fruits obtained after 5 weeks of self-pollination in an S-RNase DRH-195-derived T0 mutant line. (B) Dropped flowers after self-pollination in the WT DRH-195. (C) Semi-quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in DRH-195 and DRH-310 self-pollinated WT and KO T0 lines (DRH-195.158 and DRH-310-21, respectively). RNA was isolated from pistils 24 h after self-pollination revealing S-RNase expression in WT but not in KO lines as compared with the housekeeping gene control (EF1α). (D) T1 plants derived from the DRH-195.158 T0 line were screened with the S-RNase primers. WT-like bands with 1 bp deletion on each target site (causing frameshift leading to a premature stop codon, Supplementary Figure S1) are observed in T0 and T1 lines. Cas9 gene did not transmit to T1 line 5 (lane 5). A previously undetected band observed in lane 6 is potentially the result of transgenerational CRISPR/Cas9 activity. T0: DRH-195.158, C: Negative control. The red box is showing a T1 line segregating out Cas9 while maintaining the S-RNase KO.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Fruit formation in WT and T1 S-RNase KO diploid potatoes lines. (A). Fruit setting arrest 2 weeks after self-pollination in the WT DRH-310. (B) Fruits obtained after 4 weeks of self-pollination in an S-RNase DRH-195-derived T1 mutant line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bortesi L., Fischer R. (2015). The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33 41–52. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brisolara-Corrêa L., Thompson C. E., Fernandes C. L., de Freitas L. B. (2015). Diversification and distinctive structural features of S-RNase alleles in the genus Solanum. Mol.Genet. Genomics. 290 987–1002. 10.1007/s00438-014-0969-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bush W. S., Moore J. H. (2012). Chapter 11: genome-wide association studies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8:e1002822. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002822 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Covey P. A., Kondo K., Welch L., Frank E., Sianta S., Kumar A., et al. (2010). Multiple features that distinguish unilateral incongruity and self-incompatibility in the tomato clade. Plant J. 64 367–378. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04340.x - DOI - PubMed