Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 4;11(2):e4008.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4008.

Intracranial Venous Sinus Stenting: A Review of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Expanding Indications

Affiliations
Review

Intracranial Venous Sinus Stenting: A Review of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Expanding Indications

Lekhaj C Daggubati et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a functionally limiting disorder secondary to increased intracranial pressures (ICPs) with a prevalence of one per 100,000 persons. It is estimated to cost >$400 million per year in productively. Symptoms classically consist of chronic headaches, papilledema, and visual loss. The pathophysiology is unknown but postulated to involve increased resistance to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption. Traditional treatments involve weight loss, acetazolamide, CSF diversion, or optic nerve fenestration. More recent technology has allowed exploration of venous sinus stenosis. Through venous sinus stenting (VSS), the ICPs and venous sinus pressures decrease. After treatment, >75% exhibit an improvement in headaches, ~50% improvement in tinnitus, and ~50 % improvement in ophthalmologic testing. Complications are rare but involve stent stenosis, femoral pseudoaneurysm, and hemorrhages. Future studies will look into controlled studies for VSS as well as expansion to other venous structures of the intracranial circulation.

Keywords: idiopathic intracranial hypertension; pseudotumor cerebri; venous sinus stenting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Modified Dandy Criteria was a clinical criterion develop to distinguish idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Figure 2
Figure 2. The table summarizes the authors' technique for venous stenting after the initial evaluation and diagnosis of venous stenosis
ACT: activated clotting time, SSS: superior sagittal sinus

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pseudotumor cerebri: benign intracranial hypertension. Davidoff LM, Dyke CG. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1936;83:686. - PubMed
    1. Uber meningitis serosa. Quincke H. Samml Klin Vortr. 1893;67:655.
    1. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Radhakrishnan K, Ahlskog JE, Garrity JA, Kurland LT. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:169–180. - PubMed
    1. The incidence of pseudotumor cerebri. Durcan FJ CJ, Wall M. JAMA Neurol. 1988;45:875–877. - PubMed
    1. The incidence and prevalence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Sheffield, UK. Raoof N, Sharrack B, Pepper IM, Hickman SJ. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:1266–1268. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources