Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 3:9:202.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00202. eCollection 2019.

Performance of Different Combination Models of High-Risk HPV Genotyping in Triaging Chinese Women With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance

Affiliations

Performance of Different Combination Models of High-Risk HPV Genotyping in Triaging Chinese Women With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance

Zhen Guo et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different combination models of high-risk human papilloma viruses (HPV) genotyping in triaging Chinese women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). Methods: We established a screening cohort of 3,997 Chinese women who underwent cervical cytology and HPV genotyping test. Women with ASCUS cytology underwent punch biopsy under colposcopy/endocervical curettage. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of different combination models of HR-HPV genotyping calculated that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or higher (CIN2+) on histology were endpoints. Results: Of the full sample, 393 women had ASCUS. Among ASCUS women with a CIN2 lesion, the prevalence for HPV were 40.0% (type 16), 10.0% (type 18), 0.0% (type 33), 30.0% (type 52), 40.0% (type 58), and 30.0% (other nine types). For ASCUS women with a CIN3 lesion, the prevalence for HPV were 68.4% (type 16), 15.8% (type 18), 10.5% (type 33), 31.6% (type 52), 15.8% (type 58), and 36.8% (other nine types). Combination model including HPV16/18/33/52/58 for predicting CIN2+ lesion in women with ASCUS had relatively higher sensitivity [93.1% (78.0, 98.1)], specificity [75.8% (71.2, 79.9)], PPV [23.5% (16.7, 32.0)], and NPV [99.3% (97.4, 99.8)] than other combination models. Moreover, the referral rate of HPV16/18/33/52/58 (29.3%) was lower than HR-HPV (36.1%). Conclusions: The study demonstrates that specific HR-HPV types HPV16/18/33/52/58 may be an effective strategy in ASCUS triage. This improves the subsequent selection of ASCUS patients.

Keywords: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS); cervical cancer; genotyping; human papilloma virus (HPV); triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flowchart of this study. LBC, liquid-based cytology; ASCUS, Atypical squamous cells-undetermined significance; ECC, Endocervical Curettage; CIN1/2/3, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1/2/3.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Filipi K, Xhani A. Assessment of cervical cytological data in Albanian females. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. (2014) 15:2129–32. 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.5.2129 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Roelens J, Simoens C, Buntinx F, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch PP, et al. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2013) 3:CD008054 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boardman LA, Goldman DL, Cooper AS, Heber WW, Weitzen S. CIN in pregnancy: antepartum and postpartum cytology and histology. J Reprod Med. (2005) 50:13–8. - PubMed
    1. Wright TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. (2002) 287:2120–9. 10.1001/jama.287.16.2120 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jordan J, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Schenck U, Baldauf JJ, Da Silva D, et al. . European guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology, Part 2. Cytopathology. (2009) 20:5–16. 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00636.x - DOI - PubMed