Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan-Feb;1(1):e1125.
doi: 10.1002/aws2.1125. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters

Affiliations

Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters

Karen Setty et al. AWWA Water Sci. 2019 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory study assessed which permutation(s) of risk management frameworks and tools might benefit U.S. utilities by combining a literature review with external utility interviews. Qualitative data provided a basis for categorical assignments of goodness of fit with each of 24 framework evaluation criteria across five categories. Weighted integration using stakeholder input provided a relative ranking of applicability, later validated at a decision-making workshop. Hybridization of the American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association (ANSI/AWWA G300) source water protection standard and World Health Organization Water Safety Plan guidance was recommended to develop a comprehensive risk management approach for U.S. source waters. Cost-benefit components of other guidance materials were recommended to incorporate financial considerations into risk ranking and mitigation decisions.

Keywords: HACCP; drinking water safety; risk management; surface water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram illustrating literature review sources. USEPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of participant rankings of risk management framework applicability for surface waters in the United States (highest ranking = 1; not applicable = N/A). ADWG: Australian Drinking Water Guidelines; ANSI: American National Standards Institute; AS/NZS: Australian Standard/New Zealand Standard; AWWA: American Water Works Association; HACCP: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point; ISO: International Organization for Standardization; SDWA: Safe Drinking Water Act; WSP: Water Safety Plan

References

    1. Allaire, M. , Wu, H. , & Lall, U. (2018). National trends in drinking water quality violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 1–6. 10.1073/pnas.1719805115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amjad, U. Q. , Luh, J. , Baum, R. , & Bartram, J. (2016). Water safety plans: Bridges and barriers to implementation in North Carolina. Journal of Water and Health, 14(5), 816–826. 10.2166/wh.2016.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartram, J. , Corrales, L. , Davison, A. , Deere, D. , Drury, D. , Gordon, B. , … Stevens, M. (2009). Water Safety Plan Manual: Step‐by‐step risk management for drinking‐water suppliers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1970.tb00528.x - DOI
    1. Baum, R. , Amjad, U. , Luh, J. , & Bartram, J. (2015). An examination of the potential added value of Water Safety Plans to the United States national drinking water legislation. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 218(8), 677–685. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.12.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baum, R. , Bartram, J. , & Hrudey, S. (2016). The Flint water crisis confirms that U.S. drinking water needs improved risk management. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(11), 5436–5437. 10.1021/acs.est.6b02238 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources