Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;47(7):1297-1313.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00934-4.

The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing

Affiliations

The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing

Caitlin A Rice et al. Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

In this study we examined the interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic neighborhood variables during lexical processing. Context availability and polysemy interacted, in that words that were both lower in context availability and had fewer related senses were especially disadvantaged, as was originally reported by Tokowicz and Kroll (2007). Word frequency interacted with both polysemy and context availability, in that the effects of polysemy and context availability were stronger for lower-frequency words. Finally, orthographic neighborhood size and frequency both interacted with polysemy: the effect of polysemy was greater for words with smaller orthographic neighborhoods and a greater number of higher-frequency neighbors. These findings provide support for the context availability hypothesis (Schwanenflugel & Shoben, 1983). Specifically, the feedback activation account (Hino & Lupker, 1996) offers a mechanistic explanation of our findings that is rooted in feedback from semantic to orthographic representations.

Keywords: Concreteness; Context availability; Lexical access; Orthographic neighborhood; Polysemy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90 - PubMed
    1. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):125-57 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Jun;113(2):256-81 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources