Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 7;70(15):3705-3708.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz164.

A mechanistic view of the reduction in photosynthetic protein abundance under diurnal light fluctuation

Affiliations

A mechanistic view of the reduction in photosynthetic protein abundance under diurnal light fluctuation

Yi-Chen Pao et al. J Exp Bot. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Fluctuating light; light fluctuation pattern; light harvesting; maximum carboxylation rate; maximum electron transport rate; modelling; photosynthetic acclimation; square wave light.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(A) The response curves of photosynthetic protein synthesis rate (PPSR) to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in Pao et al. (2019) are different between Rubisco, electron transport proteins, and light harvesting proteins, depending on the maximum synthesis rate (Smm) and the curvature (kI) of each functional protein group. The effect of fluctuating light (FL) on the photosynthetic parameters under different daily photon integral (DPI) and 12 h photoperiod was simulated with different diurnal FL patterns. (B) Daily PAR distribution (%) per hour for natural diurnal fluctuation (FLN; large fluctuation (FLL), small fluctuation (FLS), and square wave (SQ) light regimes. (C–E) The ratio of maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) (C), maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) (D), and leaf absorptance of PAR (E) between FL and SQ under different DPI levels. The solid and dotted green lines with arrows above (A) indicate the ranges of PAR under FLN pattern at DPI level of 5 and 20 mol m−2 d−1, respectively. (B) Adapted from Vialet-Chabrand et al., 2017. Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiology 173, 2163–2179 (www.plantphysiol.org), ‘Copyright American Society of Plant Biologists.’
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The effects of FLN (Fig. 1B) on photosynthetic protein abundance depend on the values of maximum synthesis rate (Smm, equal to 0.1, 0.5, or 2.5) and the curvature (kI, equal to 0.5 or 5) of the PPSR–PAR response curves. For abbreviations see Fig. 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alter P, Dreissen A, Luo FL, Matsubara S. 2012. Acclimatory responses of Arabidopsis to fluctuating light environment: comparison of different sunfleck regimes and accessions. Photosynthesis Research 113, 221–237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annunziata MG, Apelt F, Carillo P, Krause U, Feil R, Koehl K, Lunn JE, Stitt M. 2018. Response of Arabidopsis primary metabolism and circadian clock to low night temperature in a natural light environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 4881–4895. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aro EM, McCaffery S, Anderson JM. 1993. Photoinhibition and D1 protein degradation in peas acclimated to different growth irradiances. Plant Physiology 103, 835–843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckley TN, Cescatti A, Farquhar GD. 2013. What does optimization theory actually predict about crown profiles of photosynthetic capacity when models incorporate greater realism? Plant, Cell & Environment 36, 1547–1563. - PubMed
    1. Burgess AJ, Gibbs JA, Murchie EH. 2019. A canopy conundrum: can wind-induced movement help to increase crop productivity by relieving photosynthetic limitations? Journal of Experimental Botany 70, 2371–2380. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms