Medicaid expenditures for maternity and newborn care in America
- PMID: 3100323
Medicaid expenditures for maternity and newborn care in America
Erratum in
- Fam Plann Perspect 1986 Jul-Aug;18(4):196
Abstract
An Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI) survey of the Medicaid programs in each state and the District of Columbia found that some 542,000 low-income women have a Medicaid-subsidized delivery each year--about 15 percent of all women who give birth. The proportion ranges from three percent in Alaska to 25 percent in Michigan. The federal and state governments spend almost $1.2 billion annually for maternity care (including prenatal, postpartum and newborn care); the average expenditure per patient is $2,200. Tennessee reports the highest expenditure per patient ($3,500) and Louisiana the lowest ($1,300). Only the highest payments under Medicaid are close to charges for maternity care in the open market, a fact that results in a significant disincentive for physicians and hospitals to accept Medicaid patients. The $1.2 billion spent for Medicaid-subsidized maternity care compares with an estimated $11.5 billion spent for such care nationwide. Thus, Medicaid pays for about 10 percent of the nation's maternity care bill, although Medicaid subsidizes deliveries for 15 percent of all women who give birth. The figures for maternity care do not include Medicaid expenditures for neonatal intensive care, which, for the 17 states reporting data, average about $11,800 per infant. Although only about six percent of all newborns whose deliveries are subsidized by Medicaid require neonatal intensive care, such care is so expensive that it adds about 30 percent to all Medicaid expenditures for maternity care. Increased Medicaid payments for maternity care, including prenatal care, could have a positive impact on health outcomes for low-income mothers and their babies, and could reduce the necessity for massive and expensive medical treatment for newborns.
Similar articles
-
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33. Fam Plann Perspect. 1984. PMID: 6432576
-
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8886761
-
Public benefits and costs of government funding for abortion.Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 May-Jun;18(3):111-8. Fam Plann Perspect. 1986. PMID: 3100324
-
Maternal and child health services in India with special focus on perinatal services.J Perinatol. 1997 Jan-Feb;17(1):65-9. J Perinatol. 1997. PMID: 9069069 Review.
-
Reinventing Medicaid: state innovations to qualify and pay for patient-centered medical homes show promising results.Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul;30(7):1325-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0170. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011. PMID: 21734207 Review.
Cited by
-
A survey of state Medicaid policies for coverage of abortion and prenatal diagnostic procedures.Am J Public Health. 1990 Jun;80(6):717-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.6.717. Am J Public Health. 1990. PMID: 2188517 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal, delivery, and infant care under Medicaid in three states.Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Summer;10(4):1-15. Health Care Financ Rev. 1989. PMID: 10313273 Free PMC article.
-
Accessibility and effectiveness of care under Medicaid.Health Care Financ Rev. 1990 Dec;Spec No(Suppl):47-56. Health Care Financ Rev. 1990. PMID: 10113496 Free PMC article.
-
Improving state Medicaid programs for pregnant women and children.Health Care Financ Rev. 1990 Dec;Spec No(Suppl):75-87. Health Care Financ Rev. 1990. PMID: 10113500 Free PMC article.
-
Association between perinatal medical expenses and a waiver to increase Florida healthy start services within Florida medicaid programs: 1998 to 2006.Matern Child Health J. 2012 Nov;16(8):1567-75. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0811-z. Matern Child Health J. 2012. PMID: 21559775 Free PMC article.