Two-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of transepithelial corneal crosslinking with iontophoresis for keratoconus
- PMID: 31003798
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.026
Two-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of transepithelial corneal crosslinking with iontophoresis for keratoconus
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes of corneal crosslinking (CXL) using transepithelial iontophoresis CXL (T-ionto CXL) in comparison with standard CXL for the treatment of progressive keratoconus.
Setting: Single-site study.
Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial with identifier code NCT02117999.
Methods: The eyes of the participants were randomized to have either T-ionto CXL and/or standard CXL. Assessments of uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, maximum simulated keratometry (K) (diopters [D]), corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) were performed at 3 days, 7 days, and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
Results: The study comprised 34 eyes (25 patients). There were 22 eyes in the T-ionto CXL group and 12 eyes in the standard CXL group. Two years after T-ionto CXL and standard CXL, the mean maximum K flattened by -1.05 ± 1.20 D (P = .07) (20 eyes) and -1.51 ± .89 D (P < .001) (11 eyes), respectively. Two study cases (10%) and no control showed maximum K steepening of more than 1.0 D at 24 months postoperatively. The mean change in CDVA was -0.08 ± 0.15 logMAR (P = .04) and -0.02 ± 0.06 logMAR (P = .34) after T-ionto CXL and standard CXL, respectively. A significant average decrease in the myopic defocus (+0.81 D; P < .05) was found in both groups. No significant differences in the outcome measures between treatments were found at 24 months. The corneal HOAs, CCT, and ECD values did not change significantly in any group at 2 years postoperatively.
Conclusions: Clinically significant topographic, visual, and refractive improvements were found 2 years after T-ionto CXL; standard CXL showed more significant corneal apex flattening than the transepithelial iontophoresis protocol.
Copyright © 2019 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transepithelial Corneal Cross-linking Using Iontophoresis with the Dresden Protocol in Progressive Keratoconus.Ophthalmology. 2017 Jun;124(6):804-812. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.040. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Ophthalmology. 2017. PMID: 28283279 Clinical Trial.
-
Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 23;3(3):CD013512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013512.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33765359 Free PMC article.
-
United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment.Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1259-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.052. Epub 2017 May 7. Ophthalmology. 2017. PMID: 28495149 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: three-year results.Ophthalmology. 2014 Apr;121(4):812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.028. Epub 2014 Jan 6. Ophthalmology. 2014. PMID: 24393351 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking surgery versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking surgery for keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0657-2. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29282020 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison between standard and transepithelial corneal crosslinking using a theranostic UV-A device.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;258(4):829-834. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04595-6. Epub 2020 Jan 3. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31900647
-
A comparison of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linkage using standard or personalised keratometry thresholds.Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun;38(9):1681-1686. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02994-6. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Eye (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38409307 Free PMC article.
-
Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review.Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;229:274-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 25. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34048801 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 3;10:1146529. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1146529. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37534322 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Standard and Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus: A Meta-analysis.J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 29;2021:6679770. doi: 10.1155/2021/6679770. eCollection 2021. J Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33575037 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous