Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;56(6):860-868.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Accuracy of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and BMI Over Time in Emerging Adults

Leah M Lipsky  1 , Denise L Haynie  2 , Christine Hill  2 , Tonja R Nansel  2 , Kaigang Li  3 , Danping Liu  4 , Ronald J Iannotti  5 , Bruce Simons-Morton  2
Affiliations

Accuracy of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and BMI Over Time in Emerging Adults

Leah M Lipsky et al. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Self-reported height and weight may lead to inaccurate estimates of associations between BMI and health indicators. The purpose of this study is to assess anthropometric misreporting in emerging adults, compare weight classification by self-reported and direct measures, and examine associations of self-reported and direct measures with cardiometabolic biomarkers.

Methods: Self-reported and directly measured height and weight were obtained in five waves of a nationally representative cohort study of U.S. tenth graders (n=2,785) conducted in 2010-2016; data were analyzed in 2018. Cardiometabolic biomarkers were assessed in three waves in a systematically recruited subsample (n=567). Pearson correlations (r) and Lin's concordance correlations (ρc) evaluated misreporting. Gwet agreement coefficient-1 evaluated weight classification agreement by self-reported and direct measures. Generalized estimating equations examined associations of cardiometabolic biomarkers with self-reported and direct measures.

Results: Participants overreported height by 1.0-1.7 cm and underestimated weight by 0.6-1.7 kg. Self-reported BMI was 0.6-1.0 lower than measured. Self-reported and measured height, weight, and BMI were strongly correlated (r=0.88-0.97, 0.86-0.98, and 0.65-0.96, respectively) and concordant (ρc=0.82-0.96, 0.94-0.97, and 0.65-0.95, respectively). Agreement of weight classification by self-reported and direct measures ranged from Gwet agreement coefficient-1=0.79-0.94. Associations of ten cardiometabolic biomarkers with self-reported BMI, measured BMI, and waist circumference were similar in magnitude, direction, and precision.

Conclusions: Self-reported and measured BMI were strongly correlated and concordant, providing substantial to near-perfect agreement in weight classification. Findings suggest self-reported BMI in U.S. emerging adults provides nearly identical estimates of associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lewis CE, Jacobs DR Jr., McCreath H, et al. Weight gain continues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(12):1172–1181. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Viner RM, Cole TJ. Who changes body mass between adolescence and adulthood? Factors predicting change in BMI between 16 year and 30 years in the 1970 British Birth Cohort. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30(9):1368–1374. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803183. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–814. 10.1001/jama.2014.732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng Y, Manson JE, Yuan C, et al. Associations of weight gain from early to middle adulthood with major health outcomes later in life. JAMA. 2017;318(3):255–269. 10.1001/jama.2017.7092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell-Young YM. The validity of self-report weight and height as a surrogate method for direct measurement. Appl Nurs Res. 2012;25(1):25–30. 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.06.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types