PDA Biosimilars Workshop Report (September 27-28, 2018)-Getting It Right the First Time for Biosimilar Marketing Applications
- PMID: 31004040
- DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2019.010215
PDA Biosimilars Workshop Report (September 27-28, 2018)-Getting It Right the First Time for Biosimilar Marketing Applications
Abstract
This workshop report summarizes the presentations, the breakout session outcomes, and the speaker panel discussions from the PDA Biosimilars Workshop held September 27-28, 2018, in Washington, DC. This format was deliberately selected for the workshop with the expectation of delivering a post-workshop paper on current best practices and existing challenges for sponsors. The event, co-chaired by Dr. Stephan Krause (AstraZeneca Biologics) and Dr. Emanuela Lacana (CDER/FDA), was attended by 140 agency and industry representatives. The workshop was separated into three major sessions P1: Regulatory Perspective, P2: Challenges in Biosimilar Development, and P3: Demonstrating Analytical Similarity. Each of the three sessions started with agency and industry presentations. Participants then split into two concurrent roundtable discussion groups to hear the answers to questions that had been provided to all participants one week prior to the event. The sessions were recorded. This paper provides consolidated answers to specific case studies for current challenges to sponsors and agencies. In addition, the panel discussion notes following each breakout roundtable session, as well as brief talk summaries of all speakers, are provided. The first session explored the challenges encountered with submission of biosimilar marketing applications from the perspectives of regulatory agencies. Expectations for a successful submission of the chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) information were described. The second session addressed high-level technical challenges and how to avoid pitfalls frequently encountered during biosimilar candidate development, including data quality expectations, creation of the final control strategy, and strategic choices necessary for candidate selection and development. Both regulatory perspectives and industry experience were shared. The last session explored the use of statistical tools to provide meaningful contributions to the demonstration of analytical similarity. The presentations highlighted common issues and practical challenges that arise during the application of statistical tools.LAY ABSTRACT: Significant challenges are still-remaining for sponsors and agencies to successfully develop and license Biosimilars. A Biosimilars Workshop was therefore held on 27-28 September 2018 in Washington, DC, to find practical solutions to the remaining challenges. The workshop planning committee with members from industry and agencies prepared specific case studies focused on some of most difficult situations. The workshop was separated into three major sessions (P1 - Regulatory Perspective; P2 - Challenges in Biosimilar Development; P3 - Demonstrating Analytical Similarity) and each session attempted to provide practical solutions to the relevant case studies. This first session explored the challenges encountered with submission of biosimilar marketing applications from the regulatory agencies' perspectives. Expectations for a successful submission of the CMC information were described. The second session addressed high-level technical challenges frequently encountered during biosimilar candidate development, including data quality expectations, the creation of the final control strategy, and strategic choices necessary for candidate selection and development. The last session explored the use of statistical tools to provide meaningful contributions to the demonstration of analytical similarity and practical challenges that arise during the application of statistical tools.
Keywords: Continuous processing; Downstream processing; FDA; Facility risk mitigation; Health Canada; Novel format molecules; PEI; Regulatory agencies; Regulatory perspective; Resin lifetime; Strategy; Submission; Upstream processing; Viral Clearance Symposium; Viral clearance; Viral safety.
© PDA, Inc. 2019.
Similar articles
-
Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction.Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1013-1022. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9. Drug Saf. 2018. PMID: 29796832 Review.
-
Quality Issues Identified During the Evaluation of Biosimilars by the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018 Feb;19(2):489-511. doi: 10.1208/s12249-017-0892-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018. PMID: 29027130
-
Antibody biosimilars: fears or opportunities?: First LabEx MAbImprove industrial workshop, May 28, 2013; Tours, France.MAbs. 2014 Jul-Aug;6(4):805-9. doi: 10.4161/mabs.28831. Epub 2014 Apr 8. MAbs. 2014. PMID: 24714167 Free PMC article.
-
Summary of the EMA Joint Regulators/Industry QbD workshop (London, UK; 28-29 January 2014).PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2016 Mar-Apr;70(2):163-76. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.006171. Epub 2016 Jan 21. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 26797977
-
Development of biosimilars.Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5 Suppl):S11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016. PMID: 26947440 Review.
Cited by
-
Improving the understanding of originator and biosimilar biologics among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Dec;28(12):1827-1829. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 27. Saudi Pharm J. 2020. PMID: 33424270 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical