Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 May 21;40(20):1597-1599.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz200.

Estimating pollution-attributable mortality at the regional and global scales: challenges in uncertainty estimation and causal inference

Affiliations
Editorial

Estimating pollution-attributable mortality at the regional and global scales: challenges in uncertainty estimation and causal inference

Rachel C Nethery et al. Eur Heart J. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sources of uncertainty introduced in each stage of the standard modelling approach for estimating pollution-attributable mortality at the global and regional scales. In the model used to estimate global/regional pollution exposures, uncertainty arises from measurement error in the input data, unknown model parameters, and the aggregation of the exposures to grid cells. The exposure–response models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) function are constructed using many epidemiological studies. Here, uncertainty is introduced through measurement error in pollution and confounder data, within-study variability, unknown within-study model form, and inter-study heterogeneity. When global/regional pollution exposure estimates are plugged into the HR to estimate total pollution-attributable mortality, additional uncertainty is generated. This is because the data used to create the HR probably do not represent the global/regional population and because the HR function may need to be extrapolated to accommodate exposures outside the range observed in the epidemiological data.

Comment on

References

    1. Davis DL, Bell ML, Fletcher T.. A look back at the London smog of 1952 and the half century since. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110:A734–A735. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Commission. Air Quality Standards. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm (10 March 2019).
    1. Lelieveld J, Klingmüller K, Pozzer A, Pöschl U, Fnais M, Daiber A, Münzel T.. Cardiovascular disease burden from ambient air pollution in Europe reassessed using novel hazard ratio functions. Eur Heart J 2019;40:1590–1596. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, Balakrishnan K, Brunekreef B, Dandona L, Dandona R, Feigin V.. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017;389:1907–1918. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnett R, Chena H, Szyszkowicz M, Fann N, Hubbell B, Pope III CA, Apte JS, Brauer M, Cohen A, Weichenthal S, Coggins J, Di Q, Brunekreef B, Frostad J, Lim SS, Kan H, Walker KD, Thurston GD, Hayes RB, Lim CC, Turner MC, Jerrett M, Krewski D, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, Ostro B, Goldberg D, Crousey DL, Martin RV, Peters P, Pinault L, Tjepkema M, van Donkelaar A, Villeneuve PJ, Miller AB, Yin P, Zhou M, Wang L, Janssen NAH, Marra M, Atkinson RW, Tsang H, Thach TQ, Cannon JB, Allen RT, Hart JE, Laden F, Cesaroni G, Forastiere F, Weinmayr G, Jaensch A, Nagel G, Concin H, Spadaro JV.. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018;115:9592–9597. - PMC - PubMed