Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;43(8):2069-2076.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05009-8.

The Clinical Implications of Peripancreatic Fluid Collection After Distal Pancreatectomy

Affiliations

The Clinical Implications of Peripancreatic Fluid Collection After Distal Pancreatectomy

Jun Yoshino et al. World J Surg. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy (DP) remains an unsolved problem, and postoperative CT imaging often demonstrates fluid collection (FC) around the pancreatic remnant. This study sought to clarify the clinical implications of FC.

Methods: This study enrolled 146 patients who underwent DP. FC was defined as a cyst-like lesion ≥ 10 mm in diameter on CT imaging at postoperative day (POD) 7. FC size, irregularity of FC margin, and air bubbles in FC were investigated. In addition, clinical data were retrospectively collected, and useful predictive factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were analyzed.

Results: Clinically relevant POPF was observed in 26 patients (17.8%), and FC was detected in 136 patients (94.4%). Multivariate analysis identified FC size and drain amylase levels on POD3 as significant risk factors for POPF. Cutoff values were determined by ROC analyses, and the levels of the FC size and drain amylase on POD3 were determined as 41 mm and 1026 IU/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of FC diameters > 41 mm were 76.9% and 75.0%, respectively, while those of drain amylase levels > 1026 IU on POD3 were 73.1% and 75.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: While treating some FCs after DP was necessary for the management of POPF, others did not require any intervention since most of them spontaneously disappeared. FC size and drain amylase levels on POD3 were found to be significantly associated with POPF and could potentially help to determine appropriate treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hackert T, Werner J, Buchler MW (2011) Postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surgeon 9:211–217 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez JR, Germes SS, Pandharipande PV et al (2006) Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 141:361–365 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A et al (2006) Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 141:1071–1076 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1691–1697 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Chincarini M, Zamboni GA, Pozzi Mucelli R (2018) Major pancreatic resections: normal postoperative findings and complications. Insights Imaging 9:173–187 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources