Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs
- PMID: 31004276
- PMCID: PMC7080679
- DOI: 10.1007/s11282-019-00387-0
Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of bitewing and panoramic radiographs in marginal bone level measurements in terms of inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Methods: Fifty paired bitewing and panoramic images were used. Eight observers measured marginal bone level at the mesial and distal surfaces of tooth 25 and tooth 35. Thus, in total 100 radiographs of 400 measurements were obtained for each observer. To evaluate intra-observer agreement, three observers re-evaluated the radiographs after a minimum of 1 month. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was applied to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement. The t test was applied to assess possible difference in measurement between bitewing and panoramic radiographs.
Results: The mean ICC value of inter-observer agreement was 0.85 for bitewing and 0.66 for panoramic radiographs. The mean intra-observer agreement was 0.92 and 0.76 for bitewing and panoramic radiographs, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between bitewing and panoramic radiographs in measurements of marginal bone level on maxillary tooth 25, whereas a statistically significant difference was found between the two image modalities on mandible tooth 35.
Conclusion: Bitewing examination should be the choice of image modality for assessment of marginal bone level at premolar region due to good to excellent reliability and low radiation dose. However if a panoramic radiograph already exists, a rough estimation of marginal bone level at premolar region is clinically acceptable bearing in mind that the bone height of the mandible premolar region might be overestimated as compared to bitewing radiograph.
Keywords: Digital radiology; Intraoral image; Marginal bone level; Observer variations; Panoramic image.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any conflict of interest for this study.
Figures
References
-
- Akesson L, Hakansson J, Rohlin M, Zoger B. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics. Swed Dent J. 1993;17:9–21. - PubMed
-
- Ivanauskaité D, Lindh C, Rangne K, Rohlin M. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue. Stomatologija. 2006;8:9–15. - PubMed
-
- Ivanauskaité D, Lindh C, Rohlin M. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography. Stomatologija. 2008;10:36–43. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources