Energy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants
- PMID: 31004496
- DOI: 10.1111/nph.15864
Energy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants
Abstract
Agriculture is expanding into regions that are affected by salinity. This review considers the energetic costs of salinity tolerance in crop plants and provides a framework for a quantitative assessment of costs. Different sources of energy, and modifications of root system architecture that would maximize water vs ion uptake are addressed. Energy requirements for transport of salt (NaCl) to leaf vacuoles for osmotic adjustment could be small if there are no substantial leaks back across plasma membrane and tonoplast in root and leaf. The coupling ratio of the H+ -ATPase also is a critical component. One proposed leak, that of Na+ influx across the plasma membrane through certain aquaporin channels, might be coupled to water flow, thus conserving energy. For the tonoplast, control of two types of cation channels is required for energy efficiency. Transporters controlling the Na+ and Cl- concentrations in mitochondria and chloroplasts are largely unknown and could be a major energy cost. The complexity of the system will require a sophisticated modelling approach to identify critical transporters, apoplastic barriers and root structures. This modelling approach will inform experimentation and allow a quantitative assessment of the energy costs of NaCl tolerance to guide breeding and engineering of molecular components.
Keywords: barley and wheat; energy costs; membrane transport; photosynthesis; respiration; root anatomy; salt tolerance; sodium and chloride transport.
© 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust.
Comment in
-
The salinity challenge.New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(3):1047-1048. doi: 10.1111/nph.16357. New Phytol. 2020. PMID: 31894589 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Energy costs of salinity tolerance in crop plants: night-time transpiration and growth.New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(3):1152-1165. doi: 10.1111/nph.15773. Epub 2019 Mar 30. New Phytol. 2020. PMID: 30834533
-
Toward a biophysical understanding of the salt stress response of individual plant cells.J Theor Biol. 2015 Nov 21;385:130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Sep 8. J Theor Biol. 2015. PMID: 26362103
-
Root vacuolar Na+ sequestration but not exclusion from uptake correlates with barley salt tolerance.Plant J. 2019 Oct;100(1):55-67. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14424. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Plant J. 2019. PMID: 31148333
-
Osmotic adjustment and energy limitations to plant growth in saline soil.New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(3):1091-1096. doi: 10.1111/nph.15862. Epub 2019 May 21. New Phytol. 2020. PMID: 31006123 Review.
-
Can Alternative Metabolic Pathways and Shunts Overcome Salinity Induced Inhibition of Central Carbon Metabolism in Crops?Front Plant Sci. 2020 Aug 4;11:1072. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01072. eCollection 2020. Front Plant Sci. 2020. PMID: 32849676 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Salt Stress Induces Changes in Physiological Characteristics, Bioactive Constituents, and Antioxidants in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.).Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Oct 10;11(10):2005. doi: 10.3390/antiox11102005. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36290728 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Biophysical Model of Ion and Water Transport in Plant Roots. III. Quantifying the Energy Costs of Ion Transport in Salt-Stressed Roots of Arabidopsis.Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jul 3;11:865. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00865. eCollection 2020. Front Plant Sci. 2020. PMID: 32719693 Free PMC article.
-
Coupled effects of soil drying and salinity on soil-plant hydraulics.Plant Physiol. 2022 Sep 28;190(2):1228-1241. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac229. Plant Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35579362 Free PMC article.
-
How Does Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Respond to Phosphorus Fertilization and Irrigation Water Salinity?Plants (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;11(2):216. doi: 10.3390/plants11020216. Plants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35050104 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance in Barley by Proteomic and Biochemical Analysis of Near-Isogenic Lines.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 22;21(4):1516. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041516. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32098451 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams P, Nelson DE, Yamada S, Chmara W, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ, Griffiths H. 1998. Growth and development of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Aizoaceae). New Phytologist 138: 171-190.
-
- Alexova R, Nelson CJ, Jacoby RP, Millar AH. 2015. Exposure of barley plants to low Pi leads to rapid changes in root respiration that correlate with specific alterations in amino acid substrates. New Phytologist 206: 696-708.
-
- Amthor JS. 2000. The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Annals of Botany 86: 1-20.
-
- Amthor JS, Bar-Even A, Hanson AD, Millar AH, Stitt M, Sweetlove LJ, Tyerman SD. 2019. Engineering strategies to boost crop productivity by cutting respiratory carbon loss. Plant Cell 31: 297-314.
-
- Asif MA, Schilling RK, Tilbrook J, Brien C, Dowling K, Rabie H, Short L, Trittermann C, Garcia A, Barrett-Lennard EG et al. 2018. Mapping of novel salt tolerance QTL in an Excalibur × Kukri doubled haploid wheat population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 131: 2179-2196.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources