Three-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge: Identifying bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities and their correlations with performance parameters
- PMID: 31004947
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121333
Three-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge: Identifying bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities and their correlations with performance parameters
Abstract
A three-stage anaerobic digester setup was configured and evaluated for enhanced methane production during co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge and the corresponding bacterial and methanogen communities were characterized. Results showed that the average methane yield (0.496 L/gVS) in the three-stage digester was 13-52% higher than that of one- and two-stage digesters. Compared to controls, an increase of 12-47% in volatile solids reduction was achieved in the three-stage digester (69.3 ± 6.7%). Bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated in one-, two- and three-stage digester while genera Pseudomonas, Tissierella, and Petrimonas were selectively enriched in the three-stage digester due to functional segregation. Taxonomic analysis identified 8 dominant methanogen genera, of which Methanosarcina, Methanosaeta, Methanobacterium and Methanolinea collectively accounted for 80%. With increasing OLR and digester stage number, the dominant methanogenic pathway shifted from hydrogenotrophic pattern to acetoclastic pattern and reached a final synergy of these two.
Keywords: Biogas production; Functional segregation; Microbial enrichment; Multivariate statistical analysis; Three-stage anaerobic co-digestion.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Changes in bacterial and archaeal communities in anaerobic digesters treating different organic wastes.Chemosphere. 2015 Dec;141:134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.086. Epub 2015 Jul 13. Chemosphere. 2015. PMID: 26184789
-
Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of soybean curd residue for methane production: Characterizing bacterial and methanogen communities and their correlations with organic loading rate and operating temperature.Bioresour Technol. 2019 Sep;288:121597. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121597. Epub 2019 Jun 1. Bioresour Technol. 2019. PMID: 31176202
-
Archaeal and bacterial community dynamics and bioprocess performance of a bench-scale two-stage anaerobic digester.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;100(13):6013-33. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7393-z. Epub 2016 Mar 3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016. PMID: 26940050
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Antibiotics in anaerobic digestion: Investigative studies on digester performance and microbial diversity.Bioresour Technol. 2022 Oct;361:127662. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127662. Epub 2022 Jul 21. Bioresour Technol. 2022. PMID: 35872275 Review.
Cited by
-
A metagenomic approach to demystify the anaerobic digestion black box and achieve higher biogas yield: a review.Front Microbiol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1437098. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1437098. eCollection 2024. Front Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39464396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural wastes toward circular bioeconomy.iScience. 2021 Jun 10;24(7):102704. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102704. eCollection 2021 Jul 23. iScience. 2021. PMID: 34258548 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources