Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Jun;19(6):589-600.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30755-2. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection following knee replacement: an observational cohort study from England and Wales

Affiliations
Observational Study

Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection following knee replacement: an observational cohort study from England and Wales

Erik Lenguerrand et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Prosthetic joint infection is a devastating complication of knee replacement. The risk of developing a prosthetic joint infection is affected by patient, surgical, and health-care system factors. Existing evidence is limited by heterogeneity in populations studied, short follow-up, inadequate power, and does not differentiate early prosthetic joint infection, most likely related to the intervention, from late infection, more likely to occur due to haematogenous bacterial spread. We aimed to assess the overall and time-specific associations of these factors with the risk of revision due to prosthetic joint infection following primary knee replacement.

Methods: In this cohort study, we analysed primary knee replacements done between 2003 and 2013 in England and Wales and the procedures subsequently revised for prosthetic joint infection between 2003 and 2014. Data were obtained from the National Joint Registry linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics data in England and the Patient Episode Database for Wales. Each primary replacement was followed for a minimum of 12 months until the end of the observation period (Dec 31, 2014) or until the date of revision for prosthetic joint infection, revision for another indication, or death (whichever occurred first). We analysed the data using Poisson and piecewise exponential multilevel models to assess the associations between patient, surgical, and health-care system factors and risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection.

Findings: Of 679 010 primary knee replacements done between 2003 and 2013 in England and Wales, 3659 were subsequently revised for an indication of prosthetic joint infection between 2003 and 2014, after a median follow-up of 4·6 years (IQR 2·6-6·9). Male sex (rate ratio [RR] for male vs female patients 1·8 [95% CI 1·7-2·0]), younger age (RR for age ≥80 years vs <60 years 0·5 [0·4-0·6]), higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists [ASA] grade (RR for ASA grade 3-5 vs 1, 1·8 [1·6-2·1]), elevated body-mass index (BMI; RR for BMI ≥30 kg/m2vs <25 kg/m2 1·5 [1·3-1·6]), chronic pulmonary disease (RR 1·2 [1·1-1·3]), diabetes (RR 1·4 [1·2-1·5]), liver disease (RR 2·2 [1·6-2·9]), connective tissue and rheumatic diseases (RR 1·5 [1·3-1·7]), peripheral vascular disease (RR 1·4 [1·1-1·7]), surgery for trauma (RR 1·9 [1·4-2·6]), previous septic arthritis (RR 4·9 [2·7-7·6]) or inflammatory arthropathy (RR 1·4 [1·2-1·7]), operation under general anaesthesia (RR 1·1 [1·0-1·2]), requirement for tibial bone graft (RR 2·0 [1·3-2·7]), use of posterior stabilised fixed bearing prostheses (RR for posterior stabilised fixed bearing prostheses vs unconstrained fixed bearing prostheses 1·4 [1·3-1·5]) or constrained condylar prostheses (3·5 [2·5-4·7]) were associated with a higher risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection. However, uncemented total, patellofemoral, or unicondylar knee replacement (RR for uncemented vs cemented total knee replacement 0·7 [95% CI 0·6-0·8], RR for patellofemoral vs cemented total knee replacement 0·3 [0·2-0·5], and RR for unicondylar vs cemented total knee replacement 0·5 [0·5-0·6]) were associated with lower risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection. Most of these factors had time-specific effects, depending on the time period post-surgery.

Interpretation: We have identified several risk factors for revision for prosthetic joint infection following knee replacement. Some of these factors are modifiable, and the use of targeted interventions or strategies could lead to a reduced risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection. Non-modifiable factors and the time-specific nature of the effects we have observed will allow clinicians to appropriately counsel patients preoperatively and tailor follow-up regimens.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study sample HES=Hospital Episode Statistics for England. PEDW=Patient Episode Database for Wales. *In this research, only data for England and Wales were considered; data collection for Northern Ireland commenced on Feb 1, 2013, and primary and revision procedures from this country could not be considered because of their low number and short follow-up. Data collection for the Isle of Man commenced on July 1, 2015, which was after the endpoint of the study and therefore these data were not considered. †As recorded in HES for the 5 years preceding the primary knee replacement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk factors of revision for prosthetic joint infection during the overall postoperative period (A) Patient factors. (B) Surgery factors. (C) Health-care system factors. Reference categories are in parentheses. BMI=body mass index. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. TKR=total knee replacement. NHS=National Health Service. *Adjusted p value <0·05, detailed in appendix pp 10–12, alongside the rate ratios and 95% CIs. †Volume refers to the total volume of knee replacements done within the previous 12 months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk factors of revision for prosthetic joint infection during the overall postoperative period (A) Patient factors. (B) Surgery factors. (C) Health-care system factors. Reference categories are in parentheses. BMI=body mass index. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. TKR=total knee replacement. NHS=National Health Service. *Adjusted p value <0·05, detailed in appendix pp 10–12, alongside the rate ratios and 95% CIs. †Volume refers to the total volume of knee replacements done within the previous 12 months.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk factors of revision for prosthetic joint infection in the first 3 postoperative months (A) Patient factors. (B) Surgery factors. (C) Health-care system factors. Reference categories are in parentheses. BMI=body mass index. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. TKR=total knee replacement. NHS=National Health Service. *Adjusted p value <0·05, detailed in appendix pp 10–12, alongside the rate ratios and 95% CIs. †Volume refers to the total volume of knee replacements performed within the previous 12 months.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk factors of revision for prosthetic joint infection in the first 3 postoperative months (A) Patient factors. (B) Surgery factors. (C) Health-care system factors. Reference categories are in parentheses. BMI=body mass index. ASA=American Society of Anesthesiologists. TKR=total knee replacement. NHS=National Health Service. *Adjusted p value <0·05, detailed in appendix pp 10–12, alongside the rate ratios and 95% CIs. †Volume refers to the total volume of knee replacements performed within the previous 12 months.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NJR Steering Commitee . National Joint Registry Centre; Hemel Hempstead: 2018. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: 15th annual report, 2017.
    2. NJR Steering Commite, ational Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: 15th annual report, 2017 201, 8 National Joint Registry Centr, emel Hempstead
    1. Blom AW, Brown J, Taylor AH, Pattison G, Whitehouse S, Bannister GC. Infection after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:688–691. - PubMed
    2. AW Blom, J Brown, AH Taylor, G Pattison, S Whitehouse, GC Bannister. Infection after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86, 2004, 688–691 - PubMed
    1. Nickinson RS, Board TN, Gambhir AK, Porter ML, Kay PR. The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2010;34:505–510. - PMC - PubMed
    2. RS Nickinson, TN Board, AK Gambhir, ML Porter, PR Kay. The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 34, 2010, 505–510 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boddapati V, Fu MC, Mayman DJ, Su EP, Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS. Revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality relative to noninfectious revisions. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:521–526. - PubMed
    2. V Boddapati, MC Fu, DJ Mayman, EP Su, PK Sculco, AS McLawhorn. Revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality relative to noninfectious revisions. J Arthroplasty, 33, 2018, 521–526 - PubMed
    1. Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JA, Fritz J, Bhave A, Mont MA. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet. 2016;387:386–394. - PubMed
    2. BH Kapadia, RA Berg, JA Daley, J Fritz, A Bhave, MA Mont. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet, 387, 2016, 386–394 - PubMed

Publication types