Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians' preferences in England
- PMID: 31005908
- PMCID: PMC6500285
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023656
Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians' preferences in England
Abstract
Objectives: This study explores clinicians' views of the clinical uptake of a smart pressure-sensing insole, named Flexifoot, to enhance the care and management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Clinicians are key users of wearable technologies, and can provide appropriate feedback for a specific device for successful clinical implementation.
Design: Qualitative study with in-depth, semi-structured interviews, analysed using inductive analysis to generate key themes.
Setting: Conducted in a University setting.
Participants: 30 clinicians were interviewed (11 physiotherapists, 11 orthopaedic surgeons, 5 general practitioners, 3 podiatrists).
Results: All clinicians regarded Flexifoot to be useful for the care and management of patients in adjunction to current methods. Responses revealed four main themes: use, data presentation, barriers to use and future development. Flexifoot data were recognised as capable of enhancing information exchange between clinicians and patients, and also between clinicians themselves. Participants supported the use of feedback for rehabilitation, screening and evaluation of treatment progress/success purposes. Flexifoot use by patients was encouraged as a self-management tool that may motivate them by setting attainment goals. The data interface should be secure, concise and visually appealing. The measured parameters of Flexifoot, its duration of wear and frequency of data output would all depend on the rationale for its use. The clinicians and patients must collaborate to optimise the use of Flexifoot for long-term monitoring of disease for patient care in clinical practice. Many identified potential other uses for Flexifoot.
Conclusions: Clinicians thought that Flexifoot may complement and improve current methods of long-term patient management for OA or other conditions in clinical settings. Flexifoot was recognised to be useful for objective measures and should be tailored carefully for each person and condition to maximise compliance. Adopting the device, and other similar technologies, requires reducing the main barriers to use (time, cost, patient compliance) before its successful implementation.
Keywords: osteoarthritis; pressure sensors; self-managment; users’ preferences; wearable technologies.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Wearable technologies in osteoarthritis: a qualitative study of clinicians' preferences.BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 25;6(1):e009544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009544. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 26810998 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing Australian podiatrists' behavioural intentions to adopt a smart insole into clinical practice: a mixed methods study.J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jun 1;13(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00396-x. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020. PMID: 32487234 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners' perspectives on a proposed new model of service delivery for primary care management of knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study.BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Sep 7;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0656-7. BMC Fam Pract. 2017. PMID: 28882108 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to using a clinical decision support tool for the management of osteoarthritis pain in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a qualitative study.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02564-5. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 39160487 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing behavioural intention to use a smart shoe insole in regionally based adults with diabetes: a mixed methods study.J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 May 20;12:29. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0340-3. eCollection 2019. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019. PMID: 31139261 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Estimating Ground Reaction Force and Center of Pressure Using Low-Cost Wearable Devices.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Apr;69(4):1461-1468. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3120346. Epub 2022 Mar 18. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022. PMID: 34648428 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 38413767 Free PMC article.
-
Managing osteoarthritis pain with smart technology: a narrative review.Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021 Mar 16;5(1):rkab021. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab021. eCollection 2021. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021. PMID: 33928214 Free PMC article.
-
A Simple Low-Cost Wearable Sensor for Long-Term Ambulatory Monitoring of Knee Joint Kinematics.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;67(12):3483-3490. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2988438. Epub 2020 Nov 19. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020. PMID: 32324536 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, et al. . Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1745–52. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical