Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e025871.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025871.

One-shot dilation versus serial dilation technique for access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

One-shot dilation versus serial dilation technique for access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pan-Xin Peng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of the use of one-shot dilation (OSD) and serial tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. The randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included in the study were identified from EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The last search was performed on 30 April 2018. Summary effects were calculated as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. The endpoints included access time, fluoroscopy time, successful dilation rate, stone-free rate, postoperative decrease in haemoglobin levels, transfusion rate, complication rate and length of postoperative hospital stay.

Results: A total of seven RCTs were included in the study, with clinical data reported for 697 patients. The overall access time was approximately 110 s shorter in the OSD group than in the serial dilation group (MD, -110.14; 95% CI -161.99 to -58.30; p<0.0001). The fluoroscopy time was shorter with OSD in all RCTs. In addition, the decrease in postoperative haemoglobin levels was approximately 2.3g/L less in patients in the OSD group than in those in the serial dilation group (MD, -0.23; 95% CI-0.39 to -0.07; p=0.004). No relationship was found between the successful dilation rate, stone-free rate, transfusion rate, or complication rate and the method of tract dilation.

Conclusion: OSD is a safe and efficacious tract dilation technique that can reduce the access time, fluoroscopy time and postoperative decrease in haemoglobin level. No difference was found in the successful dilation rate, stone-free rate, transfusion rate or rate of complications between the OSD and serial dilation groups. The difference in the length of postoperative hospital stay was uncertain. OSD may be a better method of tract creation for PCNL.

Keywords: meta-analysis; one-shot dilation; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; tract dilatation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias summary: judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots illustrating the meta-analysis of outcomes with one-shot tract dilation versus serial tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The outcomes analysed were (A) access time, (B) successful dilation rate and (C) stone-free rate.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plots illustrating the meta-analysis of outcomes with one-shot tract dilation versus serial tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The outcomes analysed were (A) postoperative decrease in haemoglobin level, (B) transfusion rate, (C) complication rate and (D) length of postoperative hospital stay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Schuster T, et al. . Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy using balloon dilation in a large contemporary series. J Endourol 2010;24:207–11. 10.1089/end.2009.0402 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ozok HU, Sagnak L, Senturk AB, et al. . A comparison of metal telescopic dilators and Amplatz dilators for nephrostomy tract dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2012;26:630–4. 10.1089/end.2011.0291 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins JP GS. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention, vol. 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://www.cochrane.org/training cochrane handbook.
    1. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–48. - PubMed

Publication types