Response to immunohistochemical markers' conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: association between imaging and histopathologic analysis
- PMID: 31006089
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02112-z
Response to immunohistochemical markers' conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: association between imaging and histopathologic analysis
Abstract
Background: Breast ultrasound and mammography were used in the detection of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between clinical and pathological responses with breast density and IHC marker conversion to understand how this information might be used in the future to direct treatment.
Methods: We included 119 patients who underwent CNB and followed NACT. The breast density assessment was based on the mammography examination performed at the time of diagnosis. We evaluated the clinical and pathological responses to NACT by the UICC and Miller-Payne grading systems, respectively.
Results: Of 119 patients who met the inclusion criteria, patients with high pre-treatment IHC markers levels showed higher expression of IHC markers regardless of the post-treatment IHC marker level at baseline. However, breast and node tumor sizes before and after NACT were negatively correlated with hormone receptor conversion and positively correlated with Ki-67 conversion (P < 0.05). Patients with low BD were more likely to have a cCR, pCR, TNBC, and postmenopausal status than those with a high BD (P < 0.05). BD was significantly associated with PR and Ki67 conversion but not ER conversion.
Conclusion: Our prospective observational study demonstrated that IHC marker conversion could be used to identify lesion size changes and BD. We also found that a high BD was linked to clinical and pathological responses, molecular subtype, and menopausal status. In the future, additional studies are required to validate the predictive value identified by this research.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Breast density; Conversion; IHC markers; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Similar articles
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced changes in immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki-67 in patients with breast cancer.J BUON. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):45-9. J BUON. 2015. PMID: 25778295
-
A study on clinico-pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma.J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(6):1419-1425. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_295_19. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020. PMID: 33342807
-
Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How? : IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3535-3540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6608-1. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29981025
-
Molecular shifts in breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective study and review of literature.Future Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(10):1209-1218. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2475729. Epub 2025 Mar 24. Future Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40126169 Review.
-
Characterization and clinical impact of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.016. Breast. 2013. PMID: 24074800 Review.
Cited by
-
The association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02960-0. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38378562 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous